 |
This home page
is a part
of:
The Physics Enigmas And
Consciousness Enigmas Files
"The PEACE-Files"
P. E. A. C. E.
Publication Ltd
presents:
|

A Recipe
for a Uinverse!
Greatest Search in
Humanity;
Is
it a Search for Something
We
have lost, or perhaps our
Age-old
Search for Ourselves?
The next pages contain general descriptions of
the
progression of Theoretical Physics, Reductionism
and
Quantum Mechanics during the
years
from 1900 to 1950. In this review the
emphasis is on the failure to include
the
Observer in the analyses of the Ultimate
Reality of the
Universe, the Theories of
Everything. The review parallels the theorisations presented in the
newly
published book: THE LITTLE SCROLL, which
presents
a Theory of Everything that
includes Life
and Consciousness of the Observer.
Parts of this file are taken from the writings of: Johann Grolle, F.
David
Peat, Richard Restak, Stephen Hawking, John Boslough and others.
The PHYSICS-Files
are:
00-Entries |
Introductions |
01-Part
One A |
The Progression of Physics
1900-1950 |
02-Part
One B |
The Progression of Physics
1950-2000 |
03-Part
Two |
The Demand for the Anthropic
Connection |
04-Part Three |
The Stalemate in the
Progression
of Physics |
05-Part Four |
The Alternate Mathematical Approach |
06-Part Five |
The Spiritual Connection to Man's Quest |
05-Epilogue |
The Conclusions and Discussions |
To
Home-Index-Front-Page
"According to the
basic laws
of physics, we have to include the
characteristics of the instruments.
Here, the observer,
must be counted amongst
the
instruments."
Quotation
from:
Professor Brandon Carter.
Part One A:
It is some time since men have begun talking of
one such
all-encompassing theory that may be described as a Recipe
for the Universe--one general knowledge and wisdom,
which
today is believed to be expressible in one mathematical equation, or a
set of mathematical equations. One such discussion goes as far back as
1758 in Roger Boscoviche's "Universal
Force
Law" published under the title THEORIA
PHILOSOPHIAE NATURALIS, but his forerunners were the to
fathers
of the scientific methodology, Sir Francis Beacon and René
Descartes.
The Great
Search
Our history has many accounts of
expression of intellectual desires for such knowledge as The
Ultimate Recipe for the Universe, and Socrates is quoted
as praising such knowledge by saying: "It
seemed
to me a superlative thing--to know the explanation of everything, why
it
comes to be, why it perishes, why it is?", but it seems
that now, 2403 years after his death, we are still seeking this
knowledge.
It is thus fitting that we begin our scrutiny of this search by looking
at the fathers of the scientific methodology Sir Francis Beacon
and René Descartes.
 |
Sir Francis Beacon
1561 - 1626
|
 |
Half of the Great Seal of the
United States
|
 |
René Descartes
1595 - 1650
|
The great thinker, the
British
philosopher and nature scientist, Sir
Francis Bacon, had
begun to see all knowledge of Man as if it was structured like a
pyramid with a specific top stone.” The top stone all by it
self
formed a true pyramid, but the pyramid was not a true pyramid without
it,
but it represented to Beacon the idea of "The
Recipe of the Universe".
Many claim this idea to be
behind
the symbolic pyramid topstone--with the all-seeing-eye
of God--that is found in The
Great Seal of the United States.
The symbol came from the Freemasons that signed the Declaration of
Independence
and the Constitution of the United States and is very likely to have
originated
in the idea of Beacon. This very same idea is also taken from
Beacon
and employed in the pyramid-logos used by the PEACE
Publication Ltd.
It may be said that the
physical sciences--with
theoretical physics at the forefront--have now been evolving in its
search
for this top stone during the 383 years elapsed since the renowned
mystical
experience of Descartes. After having had his famous “cogito
ergo
sum”, spiritual experience on the 10th of November 1619, Rene
Descartes
became enthusiastic about what he called the admirable scientific
method.
A sort of collective general method which would unify all of Man's
knowledge
into one general wisdom, one general unification theory. This took
place
at the same time as Galileo was in his prime and men had learned to
distil
alcoholic spirits to make strong burned alcohol drinks--brandies--to
energise
their brains. This would bring on the "Second Age of
Enlightenment"
and send the "Dark Ages" in retreat.
At the onset of the dark period
in
the history of the spirit of Man in the West--the middle ages which
began
at the burning of Hypothesis's library in Alexandria about 400 years
after
Christ --Men began telling each other, which stones were permitted to
be
scrutinised and which not. This control on the search for knowledge had
most of its roots in religion. The period lasted for about 1200 years,
during which it not only Men were condemned but also much of the
scrutiny
of Nature, if it did not have to do with the attempts at making gold.
In
this Galileo and Bruno became the most famous examples.
In the beginning of the
renaissance
around the end of the 15th century, Sir Francis Bacon made the
following
comment "There are two revelations in reality; The first is
given
to us in scripture and tradition, and it guided our thinking for
centuries.
The second revelation is given by the Universe, and that book we are
just
beginning to read." This prognosis of Bacon turned out to be
true
and the spirit of the philosophers was reborn in the form of
natural-philosophers
which later evolved into the different disciplines of the natural
sciences.
Disciplines which have, for the last 400 years, been progressing away
from
each other. The motto of the sciences soon became; "Nullius in
Verba,"
or, words alone are not enough. This in turn brought about the
doctrines
of empiricism and positivism, with the demand that the statement of the
investigator be proven through predictions, which later would appear as
facts in experiments. This has now been the guiding light of the
sciences
for the last four hundred years and has justified itself in most fields
of investigation into the nature of Nature.
Sir Isaac Newton is for many the prime witness in the search for "The
Recipe of the Universe". Newton may be described as
being
enraptured by the beauty and simplicity of his laws of gravity, and
hoped
that he would stumble on an all encompassing theory, even though he
kept
this secret, and that this would only be known after his death.
Through this it may be said
that Newton
had laid the cornerstone to all the endeavor of modern physics: To
show
and prove the logical necessity of the Universe. It is thus not the
declarations
of progress that are the struggle of physics, but this dream of Newton,
which was, and which is, the goal of the foremost physicists. According
to the physicists, the guidelines to this goal are found in the
beauty
of the differential equations.
Years after Sir Isaac discovered gravity, he was asked
about this experience. His reply; "I was just like a little boy
walking
on the beach where I saw a stone which seemed different from the rest.
I picked up the stone and saw why it was so." (A metaphor also
credited to Edison but he may have been quoting
Newton).
|
 |
Sir Isaac
Newton
1642 - 1727
|
Beauty according to
Shakespeare
is something "In the eye of the observer." Beauty
according
to the physicist is the "The logical invariance in Nature".
The empiricism and positivism
method
has particularly proven itself in the so-called reductionism, which
proposes
to seek the nature of everything by tearing it into ever smaller
fractions
for analyses. However, this motto has on the other hand, brought about
a new type of limitation into the investigation of nature and a
decision
as to what stones may be scrutinised. Now, in the later part of the
twentieth
century, it has come to pass that some of the special disciplines of
the
sciences have begun to approach each other, and even unify. This,
however,
is not coming about through some ideology of the scientists, rather the
nature of the evolution of the investigation. This in turn has brought
about critic and reassessment of the methods of the sciences--amongst
the
scientists them selves--this to the traditional methods of
investigation
and their limitations. The prime targets of this critic have been the
phenomena
that appear in the high energy accelerators of theoretical-experimental
physics, where Man has sought the fundaments for the nature of reality
itself.
 |
Thomas A.
Edison
1847 - 1931
|
Years after Thomas Alva Edison discovered the light bulb, he was asked
about this experience. His reply; "I was just like a little boy
walking
on the beach where I saw a stone which seemed different from the rest.
I picked up the stone and saw why it was so." (A metaphor also
credited to Newton, but Edison may have been quoting him).
During the former age of
information
in the history of man--the age of enlightenment in the West--the Greek
age of antiquity's period of philosophy, science and art, which lasted
for about 800 years, or from about 400 before, until about 400 after
Christ,
the famous Agora at the root of the Acropolis, became one of the prime
arena in Man's discussion on the nature of the World, Man and Reality. |
The
philosophers of the time, which ever they
were, Stoics,
Pythagoreans, Epicureans or Platonists, discussed and scrutinised all
subjects
and left no stones untouched.
At the onset of the 20th century, on the 14th of De- cember 1900, on
the
birthday of The New Physics,
Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck presented the findings of his investi-
gation
into the ultraviolet radiation and solved the enigma of the so called
ultra-violet
catastro- phe. At this time it was generally assumed that physics could
explain
every thing, which lead to the closure of the Kaiserliche Patentoffice
in Berlin and the British Royal Academy’s consideration for closing it
self down. The reasons; nothing more would be discovered since the
causes
for everything were known. There was only one thing that seemed to
throw
a shadow on the deterministic sciences, but this was the fact that
ultra- violet
radiation violated the known laws of nature--all of which were believed
to be known. Planck's findings that |
 |
Max K. E. Planck
1858 - 1947
|
energy came in individual
units (quanta) destroyed
this believe
of Man. Soon enough Planck became aware of the mystery of the
Observer's
connection in the quantum experiments and in 1931 he had this to say
about
the subject "...it is impossible to obtain an adequate version
of
the laws for which we are looking unless the physical system is
regarded
as a whole." This is indeed the case and the physicist Brandon
Carter put this into more explicit terms "According to the basic
laws of physics, we have to include the characteristics of the
instruments.
Here, the observer, must be counted amongst the instruments."
 |
Ernest Rutherford
1871 - 1937
|
With the evolution of The New Physics,
Man now acquired two classes of Physical Laws, instead of one.
Fortyfive
years after this beginning, this lead to the detonation of the
Plutonium
bomb in Alamogordo in New Mexico and thereby the onset of The Age of
the
Atom. The story of the evolution of the New Physics, quantum physics,
is a story of a discipline which tells us that the material part of the
Univer se, even Space itself, are composed of matter/energy units
whose
smallest division is one quanta. This story is seen by many as the most
magnificent part of the evolving history of Man's search for knowledge
and under- standing. |
It was the early twentieth century
research
work of Ernest Rutherford (1908 Nobel Prize in chemistry), who with
Fredrick
Soddy opened up the science of nuclear physics, through his ingenious
experiments
of firing alpha particles at thin gold foils, establishing the
existence
of the nucleus and developed the explanation for radioactivity.
It was the Danish physicist, Niels H. D. Bohr, who soon after moving to
England in 1911, had begun working with Rutherford, who made the basic
discover- ies in nuclear physics of the atomic structure and created
the
basic model of the atom we still use today. In 1916 Bohr returned to
his
native Denmark and in 1920 was made the director of the Institute for
Theoret- ical
Physics at the University of Copenhagen that is known today as the
Niels
Bohr Institute.
In 1922 Bohr was
awarded the
Nobel Prize in physics and the insatiate became a Mecca for the leading
quantum pioneers who during the twenties and the thirties, met at this
institute to present, compare and discuss their theories and research
findings.
It was
|
 |
Niels H. D. Bohr
1885 - 1963
|
during this time that Bohr, with the findings of Werner Heisenberg,
developed the prime
interpretation for the causative in the
phenomenas
observed in the quantum experiments. This is known as the Copenhagen
Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and it says that the
causative
in the quantum phenomenon cannot be established beyond the statistical,
which eventually prompted the ideological split between the two great
friends,
Einstein and Bohr, where Einstein refused to accept that this was the
end
of the line and made the famous remark "I refuse to believe that
God plays dice with the Universe".
The Ghost
in the
Machine
The physicists have
pointed out
that Nature does not deceive us in her replies and that mathematics are
a language which does not permit delusions. On the other hand the minds
of man are quite often caught being delusional. However, a problem is
still
associated with our understanding of the replies of nature in the
symbolism
of mathematics and in spit of the unquestionable and grandiose success
of quantum physics, it is still, as Stephen Hawking has said "Basically
a theory about something which we do not know and can not predict."
Here the reference is to the fact that although we can control the
outcome
statistically, we do not know what is happening. Quantum mechanical
investigation
of the physical world have brought with it a ghost, which has proven
difficult
to exorcise. This is the "Ghost in the Machine", or the
riddle
of the "Causative in the Quantum Phenomena". This ghost
has
repeatedly reappeared and has caused many a physicist to sneer in
disgust
when ever it has been mentioned. The ghost is in the form of the demand
for the observer, the scientific investigator, man himself, be included
in the outcome of the experiment. Even that he be included in the
mathematical
equations of quantum mechanics.
 |
Erwin Schrödinger
1887 - 1961
|
Here enters the
seen the most famous of all quantum physics thought
experiments.
This is Erwin Schrö- dinger's riddle of the cat in the box. A
metaphor
whose focal questions are till open for debate in science, but whose
solution is nowhere in sight.
The trail of the ghost is
found in
remarkable remarks of many of the physicists and it can be said that
Plank
himself initiated this in 1931, when he said "Science can never
solve
the enigma of Nature, and this is because that in the final analyzes,
we
our selves are a part of the puzzle, which we are trying to
solve."
This is still echoing in numerous such remarks, which focus on the
finding that at the quantum level, the existence of the Universe
depends on an Observer. |
The situation on the causative in quantum phenomena
is still
not conclusively resolved and this has resulted in numerous theoretical
interpretations of quantum reality, where none include the Observer and
the consciousness connection. It may be said that it was
Schrödinger,
who with his 1944 book; WHAT IS LIFE?, started any serious
quantum
physicists contemplation of the connection of life and consciousness to
quantum physics.
However, right at the onset of the evolution of the discoveries of
quantum
mechanics, the British physi- cists Sir James Jeans had made the famous
remark: "The
Universe begins to look more like a great thought than a machine."
In view of the questions
regarding
the suggested Observer dependence of the Universe and the failure of
physics
to connect the quantum theory to life and consciousness, Jeans may have
been closer to the core of the riddle of the Universe in his remark,
than the words indicate and he realised.
Later, Adolf Portman
commented on
this stalemate; "It is now known that the natural sciences have
arrived
at the borders of the physically knowable.
|
 |
James Jeanes
1877 - 1946
|
They have had to acknowledge
an infinite mystical domain behind all life." It is this connection and this
stalemate that is now
the
most important question in humanity, but here the suggestion of the QF-theory
is that; "It is Man who is playing the dice, not God. That the
metaphorical
dice are the two hemispheres in the human brain and that we are
throwing
the dice in such a manner that we only see one of them."
The
riddle of the Observer
became obvious
right at the onset of the quantum experimentation and the ensuing
efforts
at explanation through theorisations, but the brilliant physicist and
writer,
Professor Fred Alan Wolf makes a clear picture of this in the
Introduction
in his 1981 book TAKING THE QUANTUM LEAP. There he explains to
the
reader how the quantum pioneers were dealing with something which no
one
saw with their eyes, something that was in reality only taking place in
their own minds, or rather that:
 |
Wolfgang Pauli
1900 - 1958
|
"...quantum
mechanics indicated that what one observed on an atomic scale 'created'
and determ- ined what onw saw. It was like always seeing light through
a
set of col- oured filters. The colour of
the
light depends on the filter used. yet
there
was no way to get rid of the filters.
Physicists don't know what the filters are."
It is precisely the
discovery of the
explanation for this "filter"
and its workings in the human brain, that is at the core of the QF-theory,
but at the time of the quant- um pioneers, not enough information about
the human brain was available for them to be capable of solving its
riddle.
|
Nevertheless, as early as
1930, the
temperamental 1945 “Exclusion Principle” Nobel laureate,
Professor Wolfgang Pauli, had been to Zurich to see
Carl Gustaf
Jung, where
he--amongst other
questions he had for the famous "true
father" of modern psychology-- involved his search for an
understanding
of the connection between the observer and the experiment. Jung could
not
provide the answer, but the psychology he founded, has now solved this
enigma. -- Later Pauli was quoted saying "Behind
reality
there is an elevated and independent order which both the spirit of the
observer, as well as the object of investigation, are subject to."
It would be the seeds sowed by the psychology pioneers, Carl Gustaf
Jung
and William James, that would eventually produce the solution to the
riddle
of the physicists "filters".
This solution would be--as pre- dicted--through a unification theory in
physics,
that not only unified the four forces of Nature, the quantum theo- ry
and
general relativity, but also provide the connect- ion between quantum
theory,
life and consciousness.
The fundaments for making
the connection
between the quantum reality description of physics and the
psychological
reality description of the Observer, would have to be based in a true
description
of the Observer's psyche. For this end the erroneous descriptions of
the |
 |
Carl Gustaf Jung
1875 - 1961
|
Observer psyche that havebeen prevailing in the twentieth
century, have
prevented
an understanding that allowed such a connection.
In the
creation of the QF-theory
connection, extensive help was found in the interpretation of mythology
offered by Dr. Jung and that of Professor Joseph Campbell.
 |
Eugine Wigner
1901 - 1995
|
On of the most remarkable remarks made by any physicist, is the one
by
the physicist and Nobel laur- eate, Eugene Wigner, who claimed that "Man
will never understand physical reality unless he takes into account the
self reflecting properties of his consciousness." This is
reflected
in the famous picture REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED, by the Belgian
artist
René Magritte (1898-1967), where he portrays a young man
standing
before the mirror, but not getting a mirror image of himself, but an
image
as seen by someone viewing him from the behind. Wigner's remark is a
nothing
short of a demand for the ultimate inclusion of the Observer's in any
future Unifi- cation Equations of Physics,
claiming the ultimate truth about the Universe and all that is in it. |
Francis of Assisi (1182-1226)
described
the difficulties in comprehending the "self reflecting properties
of his consciousness" thus: "Who is it that does the
knowing?
What we are seeking is that which is seeking." The Buddha
and Bishop George Berkeley (1685-1753) are known for remarks of this
nature,
but remarkable enough, the QF-theory
shows that the key to the final riddles of the Universe's
Unification Theory,
are in the explanation for the
composition
and function of Consciousness and the Human Brain and the interactions
of the two.
Here we must take care not to forget the grand old man of physics,
Professor
Emeritus, John Archibald Wheeler, who has emphasised the fact that
quantum
theory forces us to look inward by the comment "Nothing is more
important
about quantum physics than this: it has destroyed the concept of the
world as 'sitting out there.' The universe will never afterwards be the
same." Wheeler has made one of the most remarkable remarks
regarding
the search for "The Recipe for the
Universe!" but
this is as follows: "Behind it all is surely an idea so
simple,
so beautiful, so compelling that when--in a decade, a century or a
millennium--we
grasp it, we will all say to each other, how could it be oth- erwise?
How
could we have been so stupid for so long?" |
 |
John A.
Wheeler 1911 - 20??
|
These remarks are not new in
the history
of Man and have been heard at other times, but we are reminded that
2400
years go Protagoras (480?-411? BC) pointed out that "Man
is
the measurer of all things." This is indeed the crux of the
riddles
of physics.
The
Antimatter
When the father of Quantum Electro
Dynamics (QED), the Nobel laureate, Paul Dirac, in 1927, presented his
equations describing the electron and at the same time discovered the
equation
for the positron, the antimatter, there appeared numerous theories
about
another Universe made of antimatter. These speculations increased as
antimatter
was discovered in cosmic rays in 1931. Ever since this, the
astrophysicists
have been looking for antimatter planets and antimatter galaxies.
Fortunately
not a thither has been found of the much dangerous to our world
antimatter
bodies. Our world would be destroyed in a burst of light, should it
come
into contact with antimatter. The case of antimatter has primarily had
to do with the possibility of turning matter particles into their
mirror
images.
 |
Paul A. M.
Dirac
1902 - 1984
|
Later, when the physicists began to investigate the energy exchanges of
the electron, it was discovered that the mathematics told them that
it
(the electron) was endowed with infinite energy while it was engaged
in the exchange. This was of course an absurdity for the physicists and
to solve this problem a mathematical renormalization process was
created
to whip this out. When Paul Dirac, heard about this, he sternly
pro- tested
claiming that this meant that something was being swept under the rug.
The causes were not investigated and the phenomena not explained. There
are still doubts about this solution.
In 1931, the same year
as Dirac's
discovery of the existance of the antimatter version of matter is
proven,
|
a brilliant 25 year old Czechoslovakian born mathematician at the
University
of Vienna, Kurt Gödel, presents to the world a most
peculiar insight into the nature of mathematics. This is the so-called Incompleteness
Theorem, which tells the world that mathematics cannot
solve
all problems, or that there are limits to what mathematics can resolve.
The reasons for this finding has not been explained, but that is a part
of the failure to explain conclusively why and what this abstraction of
our brain--mathematics--really is. Neither have our physicists fully
excepted
the consequences of this, but that has rendered some of the
mathematical
conclusions of the late 20th century quite suspicious. Oddly enough, it
was the 1984 connection of this theorem to the 1980 published
neurological
findings of Dr. Roger Sperry's research, that became the ignition
of the ideas that eventually lead to the publication of the QF-theory,
18 year later.
Einstein's
Search
Albert Einstein is here an example of a physicist who re- volutionizes
physics, only by following his sense of aesthetics. When Einstein
began,
he found two shining theories: Maxwell's Theory of Electro-magnetism
and
the Gravitational Theory of Newton. Nothing indicated that these
theories might be erroneous--only a small aesthetic discrepancy:--They
did
not fit together. Maxwell's equations did not permit anything
travelling
between places faster than the speed of light, on the other hand, the
gravitation
of Newton distributed itself over cosmic distances with infinite speed.
Einstein's cure for this malady was a new theory of gravity,
relativity--which
is, to this day, no doubt, the most beautiful of all science
theories. |
 |
Albert Einstein
1879 - 1955
|
Smitten by this beauty, also
Einstein,
like Newton, fell for the desire after the last theory of the complete
unification of the Laws of Nature. He dedicated the rest of his life to
this endeavor; To melt together into one theoretical structure, Gravity
and Electromagnetism, in the form of something which has been called
the Unified
Field Equation.
Einstein eventually made a suggestion
for
this equation and called it the Universal
Constant.
The suggestion turned out to be unfounded and Einstein said to have
regretted
much this attempt. When the efforts of Einstein proved useless, the
hope
for the realization of this dream faded with new discoveries. In stead
of unifying the two known force (Electromagnetism and Gravity), the
progression
of physics forced the physicists into the micro universe of the atom
and
added to it two new forces: The so called Weak-Interactions (Weak
Nuclear
Force) and the Strong Interactions (Strong Nuclear Force). Not only the
forces, but the particles them selves, refused to bow to some simple
rules
and the physicists began to drown in a flood of new basic particles: If
the world of the physicist had began in the twenties with only two
matter
particles, that is the proton and the electron, now Man--in the
fifties--got
lost in an ever more incomprehensible collection of particles. The term
“Particle Zoo” was coned with ower two hundred “fundamental particles”
being discovered by the experimental physicists by their ever-bigger
accelerators.
The Birth
of Super
Symmetry
 |
Theodor Kaluza
1884 - 1954
|
In the later half of the 20th century so-called Super- symmetry
Theories
were being developed. These are theories, which evolved out of what is
known as the Kaluza-Kline discoveries, which first appeared in 1919,
and
which are very special solutions to the equations of general relativity
from 1916. In 1919 the East-Prussian Köeningsberg mathematician,
Theodor Kaluza, was experimenting with writing the General Relativity
equat- ions
in the “5th dimensions”. To his surprise the equations
transformed
into the equations of Maxwell's electromagnetism, showing for the first
time a mathe- matical connection between gravity and electromagne-
tism.
In combination with mathematical models known as Group Theory, these
solutions
have now evolved |
into the Supersymmetry
Mathematics and have lead to a
mathematical
discovery of twice the number of particles observed, the Susy
particles,
which have not been detected. Kaluza told Einstein about this
discovery,
but nothing came of it until in the later part of the century when this
discovery was rediscovered and began to produce the Supersymmetry
Theories.
But is this search of the New Physics
bringing
us any closer to the ultimate Recipe for
the
Universe? On the 13th
of June 1988 NEWSWEEK presented an
interview with Professor Stephen Hawking on the occasion of the
publication
of his book A BRIEF HISTORY OF
TIME. In this interview he
expressed
his opinion that it will be possible to explain--in one mathematical
equation--all
that is observable in creation. That the solution would be in
mathematics
and that he was convinced that "God spoke
that
language." One of the
prime components of this equation
are the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics,
thereby
the unification of the classical laws of physics/the mechanical laws,
with
the statistical/quantum mechanical laws.
Ever since Rutherford, at the
beginning of
the century, began his famous experiments by firing alpha particles at
thin gold foils, and along with Bohr, created our new ideas of the
Atom,
this method has been evolving in the building of ever larger
accelerators,
with ever increasing energy. In this we have been asking nature
questions
and she has been replying to us. - In turn we have had to use the
discipline
of mathematics to understand Nature's answers. This has been relatively
successful but none the less critic on this method has appeared in the
form of metaphors which suggest that this is like someone taking a
sledge
hammer and with it, granulating grandpas watch, then getting
someone,
who has never seen a watch, to investigate the fragments and ask him to
tell what they once were and how they worked together. The critic is
connected
to doubts about our interpretation and understanding of Nature's
answers.
This became particularly apparent in the last part of the 20th century,
where the attempts at creating so-called Superstring
Theories with several extra dimensions in addition to
the
4 we are used to, resulted in several variations of Theories
of Everything, which all turned out to be mathematically
correct, although they did not match each other. A further problem with
these theories was the fact that we only have one Universe to fit them
to, not several. Towards the end of the century this became quite
embarrassing
for physics and some began to suspect that the old Incompleteness
Theorem from 1931 had something to do with this
situation.
This we now scrutinise in the history of further developments of The
Great Search for the Recipe of the Universe in the next
part of the file.
"Man will never
understand
physical reality unless he takes into account the self reflecting
properties
of his consciousness."
Quotation
from:
Professor Eugene Wigner