 |
The Physics Enigmas And Consciousness Enigmas Files "The PEACE-Files" P. E. A. C. E.
|
| The
Contents
of the Prophesied
Book: "THE LITTLE SCROLL" Following are the contents of a seven part book presenting the worlds first models for a complete quantum mechanical and molecular biological theoretical paradigm of unification. This is claimed as: "The Ultimate Theory of Everything" Although the
Subject of the
Book takes References in Religious Prophesies, it is not Religion
Oriented. |
| 00 : Introductions | The Presentation of the Book. |
| 01 : The Preface | The Introduction of the Book's Foundat- ions. |
| 02 : The Premises | The Spiritual Justification for the Book. |
| 03 : Part One 1 | Introduction to the Cutting Edge of Theo- retical Physics and its Approach to the Theory of Everything. |
| 04 : Part One 2 | Introduction to the Venn-set Theoretical Approach to the Theory of Everything. |
| 05 : Part Two 1 | The Venn-set Theoretical Models for the Process during the Creation of Time and the Quantum Wave of the Universe. |
| 06 : Part Two 2 | The Venn-set Theoretical Models for the Creation of Mass during the First Second of Time. |
| 07 : Part Three 1 | The Initial Connections of the Venn-set
QF-Theory of Everything, to the Standard Model of Physics. |
| 08 : Part Three 2 | The Initial Connection of the Venn-set QF-Theory of Everything to Life, the Human Brain and Consciousness. |
| 09 : Epilogue | The Initial Philosophical Conclusions and Bibliography. |
To Home-Index-Front-Page
Part
Three
“But
after I swallowed it, it turned sour in my Stomach.
Then I was told - ‘Once again you must proclaim God’s
Message to many Nations, Races, Languages and Kings’”
Then I was told - ‘Once again you must proclaim God’s
Message to many Nations, Races, Languages and Kings’”
On
the Subject of the Writings in this Book
It will be only half-understood by its discoverer and a mystery to
everyone else. For an idea that does not appear bizarre at first,
there is no hope."
Niels Bohr 1885-1962
The
Key to the Abyss
"And
the voice which I heard from heaven spake unto me again, and said, Go
and take
the little book which is open in the hand of the angle, which standeth
upon the
sea and upon the earth. And I went unto the angle and said to him, Give
me the
little book. And he said unto me, Take it and eat it up; and it shall
make thy
belly bitter, but it shall be in thy mouth sweet as honey. And I took
the
little book out of the angel's hand, and ate it up, and it was in my
mouth
sweet as honey: and as soon as I had eaten it, my belly was bitter. And
he said
unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and
tongues, and kings."
The Book of Revelation 108-11
"But in
the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to
sound,the
mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants
the
prophets."
The Book of Revelation, Chapter 107
"Some
day a door will suddenly open and expose the glittering
central
mechanism of the world in its beauty and simplicity."
John
A. Wheeler
mechanism of the world in its beauty and simplicity."
"Any
Unification Theory of Physics, or a Theory
which does not include the Observer, Man, and that cannot be eventually
understood by everyone, is a meaningless and
which does not include the Observer, Man, and that cannot be eventually
understood by everyone, is a meaningless and
Apallo
Aquarian
Part
Three, Chapter One
The
Creation Visions
Initial Assessments
Initial Assessments
The
Unification of: Matter - Forces - Symmetries
that Dictate Universal Realities
that Dictate Universal Realities
"Relativity
and, even more important, quantum mechanics have strongly suggested
(though not
proved) that the world cannot be analyzed into separate and
independently
existing parts. Moreover, each part somehow involves all the others:
contains
them or enfolds them. This fact suggests that the sphere of ordinary
material
life and the sphere of mystical experience have a certain shared order
and that
this will allow a fruitful relationship between them."
"Nature
seems to take advantage of the simple mathematical representation of
the
symmetry laws. The intrinsic elegance and beautiful perfection of the
mathematical reasoning involved and the complexity and depth of the
physical
consequences are great sources of encouragement to physicists. One
learns to
hope that nature possesses an order that one may aspire to comprehend."
Chen Ning Yang
The
Authors Verification the Validity
of his Spiritual Experience Visions of Creation.
The last part took the reader on a journey to the
edge of the Universe at its beginning, but in this the author recounted
most unusual vision. This vision the author experienced in the early
morning hours of December 12th, 1984, in a hotel room in Fairbanks
Alaska. There he--during an 18-minute “mystical spiritual
experience”-- perceived the visions described here, in the
terminology
of contemporary physics, rather than in the terminology of prophets or
poets. For the author personally, the initial effects of this
“spiritual journey” to the events of the First
Second of Creation, were
an indescribable elevation of spirit and an alteration and expansion of
conscious awareness. Indeed, when he discussed them with his friends,
they were: “sweet
in his mouth”.of his Spiritual Experience Visions of Creation.
Although the author personally “felt” convinced that he had been shown–in a new form–the ultimate truth/reality of creation and the Universe, he would in mid 1988, after three and a half years of reading up on the subject, be just as conscious of the fact that he had no proof of its validity. Feeling convinced was something that came from his emotional side, and just “feeling” something, invited all forms of harmful self delusion. In spite of the fact that what he was reading into physics seemed to give a favorable impression of its validity, none of it constituted hard evidence for any form of presentation. This made the prospects for an amateur of undertaking to do the necessary research work in order to interpret what Venn-diagrams in his vision into some form of physics terms and then to commit the outcome into writing, seem foolhardy.
Right after the author’s spiritual experience numerous questions had begun to crowd his consciousness: What does all this mean? How is this connected to physics? How is this connected to biology? What has all this to do with me? How is this connected to my ailment? The questions were endless and they would end in the usual; Why me? It would then, after these questions had paraded in his consciousness for three and a half years that it dawned on him that the purpose of the vision was to produce the first and only method for incorporating the DNA, Life and the Conscious Observer into the investigation of physics. Without this, all the efforts of physics would be at a loss and remain quite questionable, but no theorizations had been able to achieve this, not even the superstring theories. It would then be at the end of the exercise of interpretation his vision and the writing of the theorizations, that he would get the answer to his question; Why me? This would have to do with the ailment of his brain, the commonest problem in humanity, which is then highlighted in the last chapter of this book, in Part III.
It was then in mid 1988, the author was visiting in Iceland while living in Luxembourg that he would go through a series of serendipitous events that would present him with the first, and the last verification of the physics validity of his vision. These would be in the form of two unique insights--one very simplistic, the other extremely complex--which would give him the confidence needed for undertaking the colossal work of producing THE LITTLE SCROLL. The simpler one would have to do with the fundamental colors of nature and the QF-explanations for them, but the sophisticated one on the other hand had to do with particle spin and its QF-explanations. Here, in Part Three, Chapters One to Four, the author presents his analysis of his visions, in the terms of contemporary physics. Then in Chapters Five to Seven he offers his biological connections to the DNA, Life and Consciousness, but these would also contained the ultimate answers to why healthy mystical visions are so rare, how they are possible and what they represent.
The
First Verification; the Rainbow Proof.
It
was in the spring 1988 that the author would come across his first
proof for the QF-Venn
diagram visions and their description of the
fundamental particles. Walking in the shopping district of Reykjavik,
his eye caught the sight of a picture in a shop window of a white
unicorn standing under a rainbow. Staring at the picture it was as if
his inner voice kept saying to him, “buy the picture, its
going to
teach you important things”. He bought the picture and its
effect would
be extended into his meditations where he would be visited by the
spirit of Newton, who told him to take a good look at his 1666 “Modification
Theory” refutation experiment. It would then be the
compliance to this idea that the author came across the first proof for
the validity of the vision and would lead to him moving to Iceland on
the first of December 1999--or one year and seven months later--and to
starting work on the interpretations of the vision. One of his first
acts while moving into his newly rented apartment was to have the
rainbow/unicorn picture in a large frame adorning his living room,
where it served him as a reminder of the explanatory powers of the QF-Venn
diagrams.
It would be while reviewing Newton’s story that he became conscious that the tree fundamental colors of Nature were explained by the QF-Venn diagrams and that they fitted the number of brane-shells in the triplicate QF-membrane Fermion particles; leptons and baryons alike. They even went further in explaining why only a green-mix band appeared in the rainbow and the prism, and not an orange one, as we can review in picture 010 on page 041. These are questions which physics cannot explain, thus the QF-theory provides the first causative explanations for these fundamental phenomena in Nature, but it would be these two insights that would serve as the go-ahead signal for the authors work on THE LITTLE SCROLL.
Figure 121 provides these insights in the simplicity of the graphical form presented for matter and antimatter rainbows, but the later one is something which we are ever likely to see. In QF-Venn graphics we can see the individual brane-shell waves waving in specific directions, but these are relative to the V±-poles of the vacuum and designated as IN and OUT. Here the Z-negative main mass-wave and the W-negative right spinning graviton-magnetic polar wave are waving in the same direction, while the W-positive left spinning wave is waving in the opposite direction. This means that the none-blended fundamental colors can easily blend between the blue and the yellow and not between the read and the yellow.
It would be while reviewing Newton’s story that he became conscious that the tree fundamental colors of Nature were explained by the QF-Venn diagrams and that they fitted the number of brane-shells in the triplicate QF-membrane Fermion particles; leptons and baryons alike. They even went further in explaining why only a green-mix band appeared in the rainbow and the prism, and not an orange one, as we can review in picture 010 on page 041. These are questions which physics cannot explain, thus the QF-theory provides the first causative explanations for these fundamental phenomena in Nature, but it would be these two insights that would serve as the go-ahead signal for the authors work on THE LITTLE SCROLL.
Figure 121 provides these insights in the simplicity of the graphical form presented for matter and antimatter rainbows, but the later one is something which we are ever likely to see. In QF-Venn graphics we can see the individual brane-shell waves waving in specific directions, but these are relative to the V±-poles of the vacuum and designated as IN and OUT. Here the Z-negative main mass-wave and the W-negative right spinning graviton-magnetic polar wave are waving in the same direction, while the W-positive left spinning wave is waving in the opposite direction. This means that the none-blended fundamental colors can easily blend between the blue and the yellow and not between the read and the yellow.
The
QF-theory and Matter and Antimatter Rainbows.
 |
Figure 121
This is indeed a spectacular conclusion
and Newton's desire to know the answer to this riddle and his constant
asking God for it is understandable.
The Last
Verification; the Particle Spin Proof.
Oddly enough, the last item on the
author's verification list for the QF-theory, and the second most
important, would come to him at the same time as the color insights in
the rainbow proof. This would be in the form of the 1981 book QUARKS,
THE STUFF OF MATTER by Professor
Harald Fritzsch, but the book he found
on sale in a street book-market.
The geometrical properties of the spin of the fundamental particles are quite a complex phenomena and it would take the author quite a lot of work and time to gain an insight into how this translated into the QF-Venn diagrams describing the fundamental particles.
The geometrical properties of the spin of the fundamental particles are quite a complex phenomena and it would take the author quite a lot of work and time to gain an insight into how this translated into the QF-Venn diagrams describing the fundamental particles.
The Particle Spin
Parity in Physics.
 |
Figure 122
Figure
122 and the accompanying text are taken from Professor Fritzsch's book,
but this graphic would in the end serve to show the author that it were
the two W±-spiral-twistor
brane-shell waves that gave the
particles their spin-direction, regardless whether they were fermions
or bosons. In Chapter Four of this Part presents the arguments for the QF-theory's complete unification propositions
validity, based on its
interpretation of the particles spin properties. This would then serve
to show the prognostics of Professor
Paul Davis to have been correct.The
First Second of Creation simplistic
Overview and its Question and QF-answers.
Overview and its Question and QF-answers.
The author’s knowledge of physics had to
be expanded if he was to decipher and understand the meaning of the QF-Venn
diagram
visions and to render him capable of connecting the two
verifications described here prior. Any further understanding would
require years of work during which he would have to make extensive
readings in physics and psychobiology and keep up with the latest
research findings in these disciplines. The digestion of the QF-Venn
diagram set
vision would indeed prove to be “sour in his stomach”,
but
this would not be completed with the analyzes of the First
Second of
Creation and the Complete Unification
insight. This would turn out to
be just the foundations for the the most important interpretations; the
connection of the findings to Life
itself and the Conscious Observer.
Once the digestion of the foundations had been achieved, their connection to the Standard Model of physics would have to follow before any meaningful analyzes of the model's connection to Life and Consciousness could be undertaken. These analyzes would by them selves eventually constitute verifications, although they might not immediately be seen as proof for the validity of the QF-theorizations. What of it; towering over all contemplations of the theories validity would be the most important issue. Can the theorizations explain Life itself and the Conscious Observer.
Before we start to look at the details of the suggestions the QF-Venn diagram models present, we shall need to gain a better overview of the events during the QF-First Second, hoping to arrive at a wider perspective. In order to initiate this investigation, the author has copied the scheme from figure 018, and modified it into figures 123 and 124. Figure 123 presents an overview of the general distribution/flows of the radiation components in the First Second, where as figure 124 is arranged to show the QF-Venn diagrams according to the creation of particles and breaking of symmetries. This should allow the reader to get a view of: “...those principles that cannot be explained in terms of deeper principles,” as Weinberg puts it, and a view of: “...the underlying influence which produces the different manifestations,” in the terms of Professor John D. Barrow. These graphs then present a view like no other and are truly unique. – Next are figures 123 and 124.
Once the digestion of the foundations had been achieved, their connection to the Standard Model of physics would have to follow before any meaningful analyzes of the model's connection to Life and Consciousness could be undertaken. These analyzes would by them selves eventually constitute verifications, although they might not immediately be seen as proof for the validity of the QF-theorizations. What of it; towering over all contemplations of the theories validity would be the most important issue. Can the theorizations explain Life itself and the Conscious Observer.
Before we start to look at the details of the suggestions the QF-Venn diagram models present, we shall need to gain a better overview of the events during the QF-First Second, hoping to arrive at a wider perspective. In order to initiate this investigation, the author has copied the scheme from figure 018, and modified it into figures 123 and 124. Figure 123 presents an overview of the general distribution/flows of the radiation components in the First Second, where as figure 124 is arranged to show the QF-Venn diagrams according to the creation of particles and breaking of symmetries. This should allow the reader to get a view of: “...those principles that cannot be explained in terms of deeper principles,” as Weinberg puts it, and a view of: “...the underlying influence which produces the different manifestations,” in the terms of Professor John D. Barrow. These graphs then present a view like no other and are truly unique. – Next are figures 123 and 124.
The
QREST-Field Graphical First Second Continuum.
Overview of the Distribution Progression of the
Radiation and the Spatial Quantification.
Overview of the Distribution Progression of the
Radiation and the Spatial Quantification.
 |
Figure 123
The
QREST-Field Graphical First Second Continuum.
Overview of the Interactions of Matter/Antimatter and the Spatial Quanta.
Overview of the Interactions of Matter/Antimatter and the Spatial Quanta.
 |
Figure 124
Figure 123 presents a diagram showing the
flow of the three components of the wave functions of the Universe,
accompanied by a line showing how the function of gravity is always
present in these waves. This may be the main point of interest in the QF-analyzes
of the unification and separation ideas. The suggestion of
the QF-Venn
diagrams is
that the matter side of the GTF
(gravitation),
is at work in all particles. This corresponds to the suggestion by Einstein that it was actually
gravity that held the electron together.
It further corresponds to his talk that the equations of general
relativity were “being
written in marble” as far as concerned the
gravitational functions in space, but “written in straw” as concerned
the functions in matter. This meant that it was not known how matter
accomplished the curvature of the surrounding space. In the discussion
of the connection between quantum mechanics and general relativity,
this will be dealt with in details. The main questions physics imposes
on the events of the First Second of Creation
are regarding the
unification and separation of the four forces of nature.
Figure 124 shows the envelope of the creation symmetries and the points of the symmetry-breaks. The symmetries express the Universe when it is in a momentary equilibrium or when parts of it have reached a permanent equilibrium. The symmetry-breaks are the crucial/miraculous moments of the initiation of changes. Changes that are the hallmarks of the creation process and which are of major help in the endeavor at evaluating the QF-visions. The four forces: EMF, WNF, SNF and the GTF are manifested by the matter part of the Universe. These are the fermions which are manifested symmetries located in either the explicate-unfolded reality the implicate-enfolded reality. They in turn manifest the energy part of the Universe; the bosons, through symmetries located in the reality that comprises both the explicate-unfolded reality and the implicate-enfolded reality. This is essentially the dual reality of the dual polar, dual dimensional reality of space, comprising at the same time possibilities for infinite dimensions. On some occasions it is fitting to label the reality of these bosons as holistic reality, as is the case with the photon, but it has particularly efficient holistic reality inducing properties, which eventually will become the most important part of the QF-theory's efforts at understanding Nature.
In the QF-theorizations the emphasis are on looking for the nature of Nature, in particular in order to see what truths she may be conveying regarding life itself. However, reductionist details are that which the QF-theorizations are building on and eventually, that which it sees will have to match the reductionistic details found by physics. In this part–Part Three–Chapters One to Four, the QF-models will undertake to investigate the suggestions of the visions, as they relate to the absolute/ultimate fundamental issues in physical reality as verified by the observations of physics. Then in Part Three–Chapters Five to Seven, the models will be looking at Life itself, the Human Brain and the Consciousness of the Observer.
To facilitate the review of the theorizations the following list has been prepared in an effort to define the 10 most important questions involved in these analyzes. These questions also describe the rest of the subject of this book, but they are as follows:
Figure 124 shows the envelope of the creation symmetries and the points of the symmetry-breaks. The symmetries express the Universe when it is in a momentary equilibrium or when parts of it have reached a permanent equilibrium. The symmetry-breaks are the crucial/miraculous moments of the initiation of changes. Changes that are the hallmarks of the creation process and which are of major help in the endeavor at evaluating the QF-visions. The four forces: EMF, WNF, SNF and the GTF are manifested by the matter part of the Universe. These are the fermions which are manifested symmetries located in either the explicate-unfolded reality the implicate-enfolded reality. They in turn manifest the energy part of the Universe; the bosons, through symmetries located in the reality that comprises both the explicate-unfolded reality and the implicate-enfolded reality. This is essentially the dual reality of the dual polar, dual dimensional reality of space, comprising at the same time possibilities for infinite dimensions. On some occasions it is fitting to label the reality of these bosons as holistic reality, as is the case with the photon, but it has particularly efficient holistic reality inducing properties, which eventually will become the most important part of the QF-theory's efforts at understanding Nature.
In the QF-theorizations the emphasis are on looking for the nature of Nature, in particular in order to see what truths she may be conveying regarding life itself. However, reductionist details are that which the QF-theorizations are building on and eventually, that which it sees will have to match the reductionistic details found by physics. In this part–Part Three–Chapters One to Four, the QF-models will undertake to investigate the suggestions of the visions, as they relate to the absolute/ultimate fundamental issues in physical reality as verified by the observations of physics. Then in Part Three–Chapters Five to Seven, the models will be looking at Life itself, the Human Brain and the Consciousness of the Observer.
To facilitate the review of the theorizations the following list has been prepared in an effort to define the 10 most important questions involved in these analyzes. These questions also describe the rest of the subject of this book, but they are as follows:
C-01 = Questions of:
Unification of the Four Forces of Nature.
C-02 = Questions of: Nature’s Basic Particle/Wave Symmetries.
C-03 = Questions of: The Fundamental Reality of Nature.
C-04 = Questions of: Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.
C-05 = Questions of: QF-Connection to Physics Standard Model.
C-06 = Questions of: Spin-nature of the Permanent Fermions.
C-07 = Questions of: Connections to the DNA Structure and Life.
C-08 = Questions of: Observers Consciousness/Reality-Perceptions.
C-09 = Questions of: Malfunctions in Man’s Reality Perceptions.
C-10 = Questions of: Unification and the Theory of Everything.
C-02 = Questions of: Nature’s Basic Particle/Wave Symmetries.
C-03 = Questions of: The Fundamental Reality of Nature.
C-04 = Questions of: Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.
C-05 = Questions of: QF-Connection to Physics Standard Model.
C-06 = Questions of: Spin-nature of the Permanent Fermions.
C-07 = Questions of: Connections to the DNA Structure and Life.
C-08 = Questions of: Observers Consciousness/Reality-Perceptions.
C-09 = Questions of: Malfunctions in Man’s Reality Perceptions.
C-10 = Questions of: Unification and the Theory of Everything.
These are the fundamental questions in
such theorizations as these, but they obviously start with questions of
the unification of the four forces of Nature and of Nature’s basic
symmetries, leading to culmination in the questions of the fundaments
of the reality of the Universe. The natural continuation of such
insights will then be in relating them to the findings of physics and
biology, with the ultimate aim of describing--in as much simplicity as
possible--the true nature of Homo Sapience
and his relation to the
Universe.
C-01
Questions of:
Unification of the Four Forces of Nature.
Unification of the Four Forces of Nature.
The
QF-theory's Unification of Nature's Forces.
For the purpose of gaining a simplistic
overview of the QF-theory's
suggested answers for the unification of forces, figures 123 and 124
are provided. They offer simplistic references for the points in the First Second where the QF-Venn diagram models see these
unification. Where, when and how the GTF
(gravitational force), the EMF
(electro-magnetic force), the WNF
(weak nuclear force) and the SNF
(strong nuclear forces) are united.
Following in this sub-chapter we now address the unification question, which is not just one of the grandest questions Man can ask, but at the same time the most important one. This question is threefold and is dealt with in three stages, where each is answered directly.
1) Does the theory indicate a Grand Unification or GU, were the EMF, the WNF and the SNF are united into one force? A GU-force. If so, then: When and how? -- Could such a suggestion be verified?
Answer: No, the QF-theory does not postulate any Grand Unification in the past and shows such unification to be impossible. The EMF is created in the quantification disintegration through the manifestation of the electron quanta, with its Z-negative wave situated in explicate reality and the reality of the W±-waves situated in both explicate and implicate reality, thus forming half of the GTF in conjunction with the spatial V±-poles. With the WNF and the SNF having been created through a detour of the triplicate-waves of the EMF being deposited in implicate reality there is therefore no possibility for them ever having existed in the form of a single force without the GTF. The QF-theorizations thus do not indicate any independent Grand Unification of the three forces of EMF, WNF and SNF. How embarrassing? Some physicists, such as Professor Steven Weinberg, have actually been speculating that this might be the case, but there is of course no rule in physics that says that these three forces must have been united in one force. According to the QF-theory, this lack of unification may already have been proven experimentally.
2) Does the QF-theory indicate a Complete Unification or CU, were the EMF, the WNF and the SNF are united with force of GTF? If so, then: When and how? -- Could such a suggestion be verified?
Answer: Yes, the QF-theory postulates a Complete Unification in the past and ending in the quantification disintegration at the Planck Energy. Beginning at the top of the graphs in figures 123 and 124, we can see that there exists only one kind of force at Imaginary Time of t -14. The Superforce embedded in the rainbow-stuff of the Special Singularity and the infinitely curved surrounding space are both in the grips of just one kind of force, the IN-force, which is properly labeled gravity, or GTF. Pertaining to this Universe, this is the only time that the GTF is alone at work and represents an absolute unification or Complete Unification (CU), and remains as such until the Planck Energy, at the moment of t -07, or Second 10-43. This period is the reign of implicate reality and during this time that the seeds of the three other forces are being created through the Z±-waves and the W±-waves. In the Big Bang disintegration, the EMF is separated from the GTF, and the foundation is laid for the later existence of Nature's two other forces; WNF and SNF. According to the QF-theory, this unification cannot ever be proven experimentally through accelerators.
3) Does the theory indicate an Electro-Weak Unification or EWU? Were the EMF and WNF united into one force; electro weak force, or EWF. If so, then: When and how? -- Could such a suggestion be verified?
Answer: Yes, the QF-theory postulates a past Electro-Weak Unification in the sense that EMF and the WNF were united in the Superforce prior to the Big Bang, but today they are two faces of the same force situated respectively in explicate reality and implicate reality. The WNF is a manifestation of the triplicate-waves of the neutrons, situated in implicate reality, and popping into explicate reality through its W-negative brane-shell wave. The WNF having been created through a detour of the EMF triplicate-waves being deposited in implicate reality. The EMF and the WNF were thus last united into one force at the Planck Energy. This force relation can be and has been verified experimentally.
Figure 125
Figure 127
Following in this sub-chapter we now address the unification question, which is not just one of the grandest questions Man can ask, but at the same time the most important one. This question is threefold and is dealt with in three stages, where each is answered directly.
1) Does the theory indicate a Grand Unification or GU, were the EMF, the WNF and the SNF are united into one force? A GU-force. If so, then: When and how? -- Could such a suggestion be verified?
Answer: No, the QF-theory does not postulate any Grand Unification in the past and shows such unification to be impossible. The EMF is created in the quantification disintegration through the manifestation of the electron quanta, with its Z-negative wave situated in explicate reality and the reality of the W±-waves situated in both explicate and implicate reality, thus forming half of the GTF in conjunction with the spatial V±-poles. With the WNF and the SNF having been created through a detour of the triplicate-waves of the EMF being deposited in implicate reality there is therefore no possibility for them ever having existed in the form of a single force without the GTF. The QF-theorizations thus do not indicate any independent Grand Unification of the three forces of EMF, WNF and SNF. How embarrassing? Some physicists, such as Professor Steven Weinberg, have actually been speculating that this might be the case, but there is of course no rule in physics that says that these three forces must have been united in one force. According to the QF-theory, this lack of unification may already have been proven experimentally.
2) Does the QF-theory indicate a Complete Unification or CU, were the EMF, the WNF and the SNF are united with force of GTF? If so, then: When and how? -- Could such a suggestion be verified?
Answer: Yes, the QF-theory postulates a Complete Unification in the past and ending in the quantification disintegration at the Planck Energy. Beginning at the top of the graphs in figures 123 and 124, we can see that there exists only one kind of force at Imaginary Time of t -14. The Superforce embedded in the rainbow-stuff of the Special Singularity and the infinitely curved surrounding space are both in the grips of just one kind of force, the IN-force, which is properly labeled gravity, or GTF. Pertaining to this Universe, this is the only time that the GTF is alone at work and represents an absolute unification or Complete Unification (CU), and remains as such until the Planck Energy, at the moment of t -07, or Second 10-43. This period is the reign of implicate reality and during this time that the seeds of the three other forces are being created through the Z±-waves and the W±-waves. In the Big Bang disintegration, the EMF is separated from the GTF, and the foundation is laid for the later existence of Nature's two other forces; WNF and SNF. According to the QF-theory, this unification cannot ever be proven experimentally through accelerators.
3) Does the theory indicate an Electro-Weak Unification or EWU? Were the EMF and WNF united into one force; electro weak force, or EWF. If so, then: When and how? -- Could such a suggestion be verified?
Answer: Yes, the QF-theory postulates a past Electro-Weak Unification in the sense that EMF and the WNF were united in the Superforce prior to the Big Bang, but today they are two faces of the same force situated respectively in explicate reality and implicate reality. The WNF is a manifestation of the triplicate-waves of the neutrons, situated in implicate reality, and popping into explicate reality through its W-negative brane-shell wave. The WNF having been created through a detour of the EMF triplicate-waves being deposited in implicate reality. The EMF and the WNF were thus last united into one force at the Planck Energy. This force relation can be and has been verified experimentally.
C-02
Questions of:
Nature’s Basic Particle/Wave Symmetries.
Nature’s Basic Particle/Wave Symmetries.
The QF-theory's Fundamental Particle
Symmetries.
Part Two has shown us the QF-Venn
diagram models for First Second
creation process of the symmetrical structures that form the fundaments
of the material world, but figures 123 and 124 in this chapter, provide
a simplistic overview of this magnificent one second event. The
fundamental importance of symmetries is accentuated here at the
beginning of this chapter in the elegant and eloquent quotation of Professor Chen Ning Yang and in line
with that, next in order is to review the QF-theory's
suggested fundamental Fermion-matter particle symmetries. These are
shown in figures 125, page 369 and 126, page 371, but they indicate the
importance of the symmetrical nature of Nature. These are the same for
permanently stable and unstable matter, with the difference in
mass/size being in the highly unstable individual rhythm and highly
unstable rhythmic interactions of the W
and Z waves.
4) The standard analyzes of the physicist’s creation process is always founded in mathematical symmetries. This presents us with an important question; Can the QF-theory explain conclusively--for the first time--the reasons for this? Does the theory offer suggestions for the reasons for symmetries being the fundamental parameters of the Universe? Can it tell us how these symmetries dictate seizes, masses and energies of the fermions and the bosons, as we find them? If so, then: Where and how?
Answer: The QF-Venn models of the First Second of Creation--like the mathematics of all other unification theories--suggests that all matter and energy in the Universe is manifested in basic symmetries or that symmetries are the first and foremost rule of the Universe. In his marvelous 1988 book, SUPERSTRINGS AND THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING, Dr. F. David Peat informs us that the Nobel laureate, Dr. Abdus Salam believes that two dimensions are the most fundamental. He quotes him saying, “God created two dimensions.” This, in the QF-theorizations is the W-negative and W-positive connection to the V-negative pole of the 6th spatial dimension and the V-positive pole of the 5th dimension; but this is the reality which Man calls God. Here the QF-theory is saying that the two dimensions–the Yin and Yang of creation–give rise to all the symmetries that are so fundamental in manifesting the Universe. These are the dimensions that along with the Z-wave they produce, give the Universe its three dimensions of space and one of time, but in Part Three, Chapters Five, six and Seven we shall see how they are also manifested in our brains. These dimensions manifest the Universe out of that which we call nothing, but which in physics is an infinite potential. In the QF-theorization the use of the terminology for the two dimensions are those of the late Professor David Bohm: OUT = explicate-unfolded reality, and IN = implicate-enfolded reality. The Venn-diagram symmetries, however, are rather unusual to say the least, since in some cases they are reflecting their other half that represents a mirror effect in the form of potentiality. This is caused by the fact that they are dealing with the fundaments of the ultimate description of reality. They are thus reflecting their manifestation in their own causative side.
This initial assessment of the QF-vision/theory is thus suggesting that creation is coming out of the 6th and the 5th spatial dimensions, but these are the “seeds” to the manifested explicate and implicate realities. The matter forming W±-waves thus manifests the fundamental particles through symmetries conforming to the none-manifested, two dimensional implicate reality of space and manifesting explicate reality in the form of matter. The symmetry transformations then return a part of this matter into manifested implicate reality of space in the form of the baryon hadrons. The four forces of nature are thus manifested in the interaction of particles in these two manifested realties. The QF-vision/theory shows no separate symmetry-break for the emergence of the strong interaction and gravitation other than the one at the Planck Energy and thus contains no Grand Unification existence of the two W±-waves (the graviton), and the spatial SNF is carried in the same waves via the meson mediated interactions, through the virtual energy/vacuum quantum potential of space. Thus the manifestation of all matter and all forces and their associated symmetries are contained in the interactions of the W±-waves in matter and V±-poles in space. -- Wow! This is really simple!
4) The standard analyzes of the physicist’s creation process is always founded in mathematical symmetries. This presents us with an important question; Can the QF-theory explain conclusively--for the first time--the reasons for this? Does the theory offer suggestions for the reasons for symmetries being the fundamental parameters of the Universe? Can it tell us how these symmetries dictate seizes, masses and energies of the fermions and the bosons, as we find them? If so, then: Where and how?
Answer: The QF-Venn models of the First Second of Creation--like the mathematics of all other unification theories--suggests that all matter and energy in the Universe is manifested in basic symmetries or that symmetries are the first and foremost rule of the Universe. In his marvelous 1988 book, SUPERSTRINGS AND THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING, Dr. F. David Peat informs us that the Nobel laureate, Dr. Abdus Salam believes that two dimensions are the most fundamental. He quotes him saying, “God created two dimensions.” This, in the QF-theorizations is the W-negative and W-positive connection to the V-negative pole of the 6th spatial dimension and the V-positive pole of the 5th dimension; but this is the reality which Man calls God. Here the QF-theory is saying that the two dimensions–the Yin and Yang of creation–give rise to all the symmetries that are so fundamental in manifesting the Universe. These are the dimensions that along with the Z-wave they produce, give the Universe its three dimensions of space and one of time, but in Part Three, Chapters Five, six and Seven we shall see how they are also manifested in our brains. These dimensions manifest the Universe out of that which we call nothing, but which in physics is an infinite potential. In the QF-theorization the use of the terminology for the two dimensions are those of the late Professor David Bohm: OUT = explicate-unfolded reality, and IN = implicate-enfolded reality. The Venn-diagram symmetries, however, are rather unusual to say the least, since in some cases they are reflecting their other half that represents a mirror effect in the form of potentiality. This is caused by the fact that they are dealing with the fundaments of the ultimate description of reality. They are thus reflecting their manifestation in their own causative side.
This initial assessment of the QF-vision/theory is thus suggesting that creation is coming out of the 6th and the 5th spatial dimensions, but these are the “seeds” to the manifested explicate and implicate realities. The matter forming W±-waves thus manifests the fundamental particles through symmetries conforming to the none-manifested, two dimensional implicate reality of space and manifesting explicate reality in the form of matter. The symmetry transformations then return a part of this matter into manifested implicate reality of space in the form of the baryon hadrons. The four forces of nature are thus manifested in the interaction of particles in these two manifested realties. The QF-vision/theory shows no separate symmetry-break for the emergence of the strong interaction and gravitation other than the one at the Planck Energy and thus contains no Grand Unification existence of the two W±-waves (the graviton), and the spatial SNF is carried in the same waves via the meson mediated interactions, through the virtual energy/vacuum quantum potential of space. Thus the manifestation of all matter and all forces and their associated symmetries are contained in the interactions of the W±-waves in matter and V±-poles in space. -- Wow! This is really simple!
The Fermion Symmetries of the Leptons.
Matter and Antimatter in Explicate Reality.
Nature’s 4 Lepton Matter
and Antimatter Symmetries.Matter and Antimatter in Explicate Reality.
The QF-Venn diagram symmetries
of Imaginary
Time in figure 124, from the Special
Singularity to the Planck Energy
(Wall), are triplicate-wave
transitory symmetries to those producing ALL matter and energy in the
Universe. The creation begins with the disintegration, which is the
spontaneous rupture of the symmetry of the expanded Special
Singularity
as the explicate-reality
event horizon transits the center of implicate
reality. Here the manifestation of matter begins as one of the
two symmetries of the leptons appears at the Planck Energy.
The second symmetry is then completed in the expansion of the matter
field at the moment of the First Quantum Wave of
the Universe, which is the End of the Birth of
Time symmetry. These are the two prime lepton matter
particle/fields symmetries formed through the positions, rotations,
oscillations and vibrations of the two W±-waves, which this symmetry is written. There is
only one state which this symmetry will hold to manifest permanent
particles, but the spatial side of these waves still carries "memories" of
its higher energy states prior to the disintegration at the Planck Energy.
This "memory"
will hold the W±-waves momentarily at higher mass/energies
producing the hyperons which be disrupted immediately as the particle
cools and it will decay within a fraction of a second.
The symmetry at the Planck Energy is–according to our physicists–the Grand Symmetry of Creation. In the QF-theorizations the symmetry at this moment is the Complete Unification but the particles-waves- membrane-superstring-fields produced at the rupture of this symmetry are shorter than the Planck Length of cm 10-34, and are in these theorizations set at the maximum of cm 10-33. In the world of the hadrons this becomes magnified up to the limit of the nucleon diameter of cm 10-13, suggesting that their membrane-superstrings are longer than cm 10-33. For comparison, the diameter produced by the larger symmetry, that of the negatron (an alternative name for the electron which is the Greek word for amber) and the positron is cm 10-16. These are the two symmetries producing the two permanent leptons, the neutrino and the electron, and they are labeled accordingly:
The Matter Neutrino Symmetry: ERLS #1MA, at Second 10-43.
The Antimatter Neutron Symmetry: ERLS #1AM, at Second 10-43.
The Matter Electron Symmetry: ERLS #2MA, at Second 10-36.
The Antimatter Electron Symmetry: ERLS #2AM, at Second 10-36.
The ERLS abbreviation stands for Explicate Reality Lepton Symmetry. Addition of MA and AM to the symmetries number stand for Matter and Antimatter. Here are the two-lepton symmetries in their simple forms.
The symmetry at the Planck Energy is–according to our physicists–the Grand Symmetry of Creation. In the QF-theorizations the symmetry at this moment is the Complete Unification but the particles-waves- membrane-superstring-fields produced at the rupture of this symmetry are shorter than the Planck Length of cm 10-34, and are in these theorizations set at the maximum of cm 10-33. In the world of the hadrons this becomes magnified up to the limit of the nucleon diameter of cm 10-13, suggesting that their membrane-superstrings are longer than cm 10-33. For comparison, the diameter produced by the larger symmetry, that of the negatron (an alternative name for the electron which is the Greek word for amber) and the positron is cm 10-16. These are the two symmetries producing the two permanent leptons, the neutrino and the electron, and they are labeled accordingly:
The Matter Neutrino Symmetry: ERLS #1MA, at Second 10-43.
The Antimatter Neutron Symmetry: ERLS #1AM, at Second 10-43.
The Matter Electron Symmetry: ERLS #2MA, at Second 10-36.
The Antimatter Electron Symmetry: ERLS #2AM, at Second 10-36.
The ERLS abbreviation stands for Explicate Reality Lepton Symmetry. Addition of MA and AM to the symmetries number stand for Matter and Antimatter. Here are the two-lepton symmetries in their simple forms.
 |
Figure 125
A renewed scrutiny of these two symmetries
reveals one of the most fundamental statements in all of the QF-visions.
It is making the profound suggestion that the reality of matter is
split into two halves! That matter contains its own antimatter
potential and carries it around in its W±-waves potential of reversing themselves? This
suggests that this potency produces in part the suggestions for the Parallel Universes,
or for an additional Universe, or Universes, inside the space/time
confines of the one we occupy.
Same as their counterpart, the hadrons, the symmetries of the leptons are of the half-integer spin-variety such as 1/2, 3/2, 5/2… Their statistical behavior is that of the Fermi-Dirac class and they therefore called Fermions.
Same as their counterpart, the hadrons, the symmetries of the leptons are of the half-integer spin-variety such as 1/2, 3/2, 5/2… Their statistical behavior is that of the Fermi-Dirac class and they therefore called Fermions.
The Fermion Symmetries of the Hadrons.
Matter and Antimatter in Implicate Reality.
Matter and Antimatter in Implicate Reality.
In the QF-theorizations
the none-independently existing quarks produce only three basic matter
symmetries inn two lepton and one baryon forms. This means that the
three matter symmetries in the QF-Venn
diagram’s theoretical suggestions are ALL of a triplicate-wave-system
composition. However, it is only in the physicist’s 3-quark system of
the baryons--due to their size--that they become clearly recognizable,
but in the leptons, two of them become so small that they are
undetectable. It is in the external SNF
force-carrier particles of this symmetry, the mesons, that the QF-models
show the two W±-waves are the fundamental components holding
the hadrons together. It follows that the nature and the durability of
the matter particles and the force carriers, as well as their momentary
aberrations in accelerator experiments, is dependent on the internal
relative symmetries of the W±-waves. This would suggest the symmetry of the
fundamental reality of nature, in which the author hopes to find that
which he so badly needs. This should be the program for the most
fundamental functions of the DNA molecule of Life, and the program for
the natural functions of the human brain.
The leptons’ symmetry at the Planck Energy, the ERLS #1s, seemed actually quite puzzling. This symmetry not only indicates a triplicate composition of the leptons–which no one has been able to observe–but it produces what could be described a half a reality? This is where the QF-triplicate brane-shells manifest in the 1/2 integer spin-state of the explicate reality. We certainly can’t have a Universe constructed out of just half a reality, but here the QF-visions do provide an answer. The ERHS #1 symmetry provides for the capture of QF-brane-shells in the confinement of the baryon nucleons where the QF-brane-shells return to the 1/2 integer spin-state of the implicate reality. These are the two symmetries of the hadrons, the proton and the neutron, and are labeled accordingly:
The Matter Proton Symmetry: IRHS #1MA, at Second 10-03.
The Antimatter Proton Symmetry: IRHS #1AM, at Second 10 -03.
The Matter Neutron Symmetry: IRHS #2MA, at Second 10-02.
The Antimatter Neutron Symmetry: IRHS #2AM, at Second 10-02.
The IRHS abbreviations stand for, Implicate Reality Hadron Symmetry. Addition of MA and AM to the symmetry number stands for Matter and Antimatter. Here are the baryon symmetries in all their simplicity.
Figure 126
Figure 126 shows how the QF-Venn diagram expresses the variations of explicate and implicate reality hadron symmetries, but as in the lepton symmetries, the antimatter is produced by the W-negative and the W-positive waves changing places. This is like taking your socks and reversing them by pulling the inside out. Both in the proton and neutron, the W and Z waves, switch into the opposite kind of quarks as they reverse their direction in a symmetry transformation.
Same as their counterparts, the leptons, the symmetries of the hadrons are of the half-integer spin-variety such as 1/2, 3/2, 5/2… Their statistical behavior is that of the Fermi-Dirac class and they therefore classified as Fermions.
The leptons’ symmetry at the Planck Energy, the ERLS #1s, seemed actually quite puzzling. This symmetry not only indicates a triplicate composition of the leptons–which no one has been able to observe–but it produces what could be described a half a reality? This is where the QF-triplicate brane-shells manifest in the 1/2 integer spin-state of the explicate reality. We certainly can’t have a Universe constructed out of just half a reality, but here the QF-visions do provide an answer. The ERHS #1 symmetry provides for the capture of QF-brane-shells in the confinement of the baryon nucleons where the QF-brane-shells return to the 1/2 integer spin-state of the implicate reality. These are the two symmetries of the hadrons, the proton and the neutron, and are labeled accordingly:
The Matter Proton Symmetry: IRHS #1MA, at Second 10-03.
The Antimatter Proton Symmetry: IRHS #1AM, at Second 10 -03.
The Matter Neutron Symmetry: IRHS #2MA, at Second 10-02.
The Antimatter Neutron Symmetry: IRHS #2AM, at Second 10-02.
The IRHS abbreviations stand for, Implicate Reality Hadron Symmetry. Addition of MA and AM to the symmetry number stands for Matter and Antimatter. Here are the baryon symmetries in all their simplicity.
Nature’s
4 Matter
and Antimatter Baryon Symmetries.
 |
Figure 126 shows how the QF-Venn diagram expresses the variations of explicate and implicate reality hadron symmetries, but as in the lepton symmetries, the antimatter is produced by the W-negative and the W-positive waves changing places. This is like taking your socks and reversing them by pulling the inside out. Both in the proton and neutron, the W and Z waves, switch into the opposite kind of quarks as they reverse their direction in a symmetry transformation.
Same as their counterparts, the leptons, the symmetries of the hadrons are of the half-integer spin-variety such as 1/2, 3/2, 5/2… Their statistical behavior is that of the Fermi-Dirac class and they therefore classified as Fermions.
The Symmetries of the Bosons: Matter and
Antimatter Force-carriers in Dualistic Reality.
Nature’s 3 Matter
and Antimatter Boson
Symmetries.Antimatter Force-carriers in Dualistic Reality.
The symmetries of the QF-Venn
diagram’s for the First Second of Creation,
are permanent matter or fermion symmetries until the Universe makes it Inflationary
Leap at which time the first energy or boson symmetries appear.
These are the photons which are primarily created out of matter and
antimatter electron collisions, but the fact that the fermions are
being created first suggests that all bosons are dependent on the
existence of the fermions, but the QF-models
require space between particles that dictates the symmetries of the
force-carrying particles. The QF-theory
does not postulate any independently existing gravitons nor any
independently existing gluons causing the internal nucleon’s strong
nuclear force. No independently created internal gluon forces hold the lepto- and hadro-quarks-branes-shells
together since these entities are inseparable parts of the triplicate rainbow stuff
of the triplicate-brane-shell
field. However, were we able to observe the symmetry of the
interaction between the none-independently-existing brane-shells
(gluons), then they would be the same as those of the mesons.
The force carriers appear in the QF-theorizations in only two symmetries, or those of the photons and the mesons (pions). The photons are the carriers of the electro-magnetic energy--the quanta of the electromagnetic field (EMF)--and thus take their shape with reference to the leptons. The mesons are the carrier of the energy of the strong nuclear force between nucleons,--the quanta of the strong nuclear force field (SNF)--and thus take their shape with reference to the hadrons.
Symmetries of the none-independently existing gravitons are dealt with in analyzes of the particular particle they are a part off. The deduction of the QF-Venn diagram’s suggestions for the symmetries of these two force carriers turns out to be relatively easy. The varieties of the boson symmetries are those of the two force carriers that have an independent existence; the photons and the mesons. These appear in three versions and are labeled:
The DHRBE stand for Dualistic/Holistic Reality Bosonic Symmetry. The DRBS abbreviation stands for, Dualistic Reality Bosonic Symmetry and the MA and the AM stand for Matter and Antimatter.
The force carriers appear in the QF-theorizations in only two symmetries, or those of the photons and the mesons (pions). The photons are the carriers of the electro-magnetic energy--the quanta of the electromagnetic field (EMF)--and thus take their shape with reference to the leptons. The mesons are the carrier of the energy of the strong nuclear force between nucleons,--the quanta of the strong nuclear force field (SNF)--and thus take their shape with reference to the hadrons.
Symmetries of the none-independently existing gravitons are dealt with in analyzes of the particular particle they are a part off. The deduction of the QF-Venn diagram’s suggestions for the symmetries of these two force carriers turns out to be relatively easy. The varieties of the boson symmetries are those of the two force carriers that have an independent existence; the photons and the mesons. These appear in three versions and are labeled:
The
Matter/Antimatter Photon Symmetry: DHRBS-MA/AM.
The Matter Meson Symmetry: DRBS/MA.
The Antimatter Meson Symmetry: DRBS/AM.
The Matter Meson Symmetry: DRBS/MA.
The Antimatter Meson Symmetry: DRBS/AM.
The DHRBE stand for Dualistic/Holistic Reality Bosonic Symmetry. The DRBS abbreviation stands for, Dualistic Reality Bosonic Symmetry and the MA and the AM stand for Matter and Antimatter.
 |
Since the photon is the carrier of the
electromagnetic force, it must obviously represent both the electron
(negatron) and the positron,
and thus is a particle carrying its own antiparticle. In other words,
it appears in the company of its antimatter mirror particle and is thus
a unique one, since in this it is the equivalent of two fermion
symmetries, acting as a function of space in their flipping between the
two V±-poles
realities. This means that the Z±-wave
masses represents both the fermion realities, as well as the boson
reality, or explicate
and implicate,
plus the dualistic. The consequence is that the Coulomb’s law charge
and rejection as well as the mass-effects cancel each other out and the
photon appears in all measurements as a massless particle.
This means that the photon represents both of the fundamental realities of nature and Professor Steven Weinberg is thus indeed right when he suggests that the photon may be the most fundamental of all particles, but that is the QF-Venn symmetry's theoretical conclusion. In the case of the mesons, all that is needed is to remove the Z±-waves and what remains are the two W±-waves in the form of quarks, or dual-brane-shell fields. -- Opposed to their mentors–the fermions–the bosons are of the whole integer spin-variety such as 0, 1, and 2… Their statistical behavior is classified as Bose-Einstein statistics and they classified as Bosons.
We have now looked at the symmetries producing the known stable fermions, and the bosons that mediate the interactions between them. One may ask; What about the Z and the W bosons? Are their internal symmetries not a part of our analyzes? The answer: Yes they are not. Since they have no independent existence, their internal symmetry has no meaning in the QF-theorizations, which here arrive at their reductionistic limits. The CERN and W Z bosons (should be the same as the meson symmetry) are seen as being artificially created and not belonging to the fundamental natural particles of the Universe. The symmetries, which we have been looking at, are the fundamental symmetries of the Universe and therefore their collective symmetry picture should represent the Universes first order of analyzes. This is indeed the case and it becomes relatively easy to sum this up in what the author likes to call the fundamental divisions and specifications of reality. This division being a conceptual construct of electric charge and quantum spin symmetries of the particles, but this is one man’s way of looking at it all.
The next chapter will continue the questions and verifications regarding the QF-description of the fundamental reality of Nature. This is where the author intensifies this simplistic inquiry into the QF-Venn diagram models suggestions regarding the connection between the two grate theories of quantum mechanics and general relativity.
The QF-Reality and
the Force of Gravity.
This means that the photon represents both of the fundamental realities of nature and Professor Steven Weinberg is thus indeed right when he suggests that the photon may be the most fundamental of all particles, but that is the QF-Venn symmetry's theoretical conclusion. In the case of the mesons, all that is needed is to remove the Z±-waves and what remains are the two W±-waves in the form of quarks, or dual-brane-shell fields. -- Opposed to their mentors–the fermions–the bosons are of the whole integer spin-variety such as 0, 1, and 2… Their statistical behavior is classified as Bose-Einstein statistics and they classified as Bosons.
We have now looked at the symmetries producing the known stable fermions, and the bosons that mediate the interactions between them. One may ask; What about the Z and the W bosons? Are their internal symmetries not a part of our analyzes? The answer: Yes they are not. Since they have no independent existence, their internal symmetry has no meaning in the QF-theorizations, which here arrive at their reductionistic limits. The CERN and W Z bosons (should be the same as the meson symmetry) are seen as being artificially created and not belonging to the fundamental natural particles of the Universe. The symmetries, which we have been looking at, are the fundamental symmetries of the Universe and therefore their collective symmetry picture should represent the Universes first order of analyzes. This is indeed the case and it becomes relatively easy to sum this up in what the author likes to call the fundamental divisions and specifications of reality. This division being a conceptual construct of electric charge and quantum spin symmetries of the particles, but this is one man’s way of looking at it all.
The next chapter will continue the questions and verifications regarding the QF-description of the fundamental reality of Nature. This is where the author intensifies this simplistic inquiry into the QF-Venn diagram models suggestions regarding the connection between the two grate theories of quantum mechanics and general relativity.
The QF-Reality and
the Force of Gravity.
Part
Three, Chapter Two
The
QF-Models and
the Force of Gravity
the Force of Gravity
Particle
Observations, String Concepts,
Hypothetical Gravitons. QF-Gravitations and the
Quantum Mechanics/General Relativity Relation
Hypothetical Gravitons. QF-Gravitations and the
Quantum Mechanics/General Relativity Relation
"I do
not mean to suggest that the final theory will be deduced from pure
mathematics... A final theory will be final in only one sense–it
will bring to
an end a certain sort of science, the ancient search for those
principles that
cannot be explained in terms of deeper principles."
Steven
Weinberg
"There
was evidence that the elementary particles had an internal structure
and had to
be treated as extended objects... Superstrings indicated that space
time and
matter was not built on an underlying mathematical structure made out
of
dimensionless points but had to be understood in terms of a new formal
language... Superstrings became the new foundation of geometry, force
and
matter... When the mathematics of closed-loop superstrings was worked
out, it
appeared that they allowed quantum numbers to travel both clockwise and
counter-clockwise.It thus became possible to have two waves of quantum
numbers
traveling in opposite directions at once without ever getting mixed...
It
was
further discovered that space and superstrings had to be taken
together... as
closed strings that lives on the surface of a sphere."
F. David
Peat
C-03
Questions of:
Fundamental Reality of Nature.
Fundamental Reality of Nature.
What
is the Fundamental Reality of Nature?
For the purpose of gaining a simplistic
overview of the QF-theory's
suggested fundamental reality of
Nature, figures 123 and 124 are provided. This is a simplistic
reference to the so called End
of the Birth of Time point in the First
Second, where the QF-Venn
diagram
models produces the Quantum
Wave of
the Universe. This symmetry is the fundamental reality of the
Universe
and our brains, and the insight which Professor
Stephen Hawking
describes as the First
Second of Creation key to the "ultimate answers
to all questions about the Universe, life itself included".
5) Does the theory offer a description of the fundamental reality of the Universe, both that of the material and biological realities? If so: Where and how? Can the suggestions of the theory be verified?
Answer: Yes indeed! The QF-theory presents a view of fundamental reality that commences in the reality of the void of space, or the dual V±-poles of the vacuum, or the V-negative and the V-positive virtual particle poles. Using the terminology that the late Professor David Bohm coined, this is in the QF-theory described as the Implicate Enfolded Reality of space and it is not only curved reality, but manifesting a two-fold reality as well, which is the reason for the physicists believing that the Universe may have a parallel counterpart with in itself. This is further the reason for the single particle wave interference in the double slit experiments. It is then out of the spatial reality, which the material reality issues during the first second of creation, but in the QF-theory this reality is described as the Explicate Unfolded Reality of matter, which is not only in three dimensional spherical shape, but manifesting a two-fold reality as well. These are Explicate Matter (Leptons) and Explicate Implicate Matter (Baryons). In the QF-theory, these two realities are manifested in the the biosphere on planet earth in the DNA nucleotides of eukaryotes, where they are evenly distributed into Exon (Explicate Unfolded Reality) and Intron (Implicate Enfolded Reality) nucleotides. In the central nervous systems of evolved organism such as Homo Sapience, the spatial reality connection to the dual V±-poles, or the V-negative and the V-positive virtual quantum poles of space is then closed through its spatial hemispheric Jamais vu and the Déjà vu centers, but they correspond to the W-negative and the W-positive waves in matter. -- The question whether this can be verified is the subject of this book.
The realities produced by the symmetries described in the last chapter are the ultimate and founding law of the Universe and their creation also writes the constants of nature. The correct apprehension of this fundamental knowledge is here seen as the turning point for humanity in its quest for a comprehension of its existence and the behavioral problems that plague it and now threat its existence, to say nothing of the–by the physicist community much publicized–anticipated consequences for humanity as a whole. The QF-unification visions--although presented in utter simplicity--represent the first such modeling that includes Life and the Observers Consciousness and thus the ultimate truth for Man. The situation in theoretical physics and in theoretical molecular biology has become stagnated and is incapable of solving the riddles they had hope to solve, with the methodology currently used. Here the QF-theory offers an alternate approach through the Venn-mathematical sets, which unequivocally show what the quantum reality options are; IN-enfolded-implicate reality and OUT-unfolded-explicate reality overlapping to form the third Dual-holistic reality as the fundamental reality of the Universe, or as shown here in figure 128:
5) Does the theory offer a description of the fundamental reality of the Universe, both that of the material and biological realities? If so: Where and how? Can the suggestions of the theory be verified?
Answer: Yes indeed! The QF-theory presents a view of fundamental reality that commences in the reality of the void of space, or the dual V±-poles of the vacuum, or the V-negative and the V-positive virtual particle poles. Using the terminology that the late Professor David Bohm coined, this is in the QF-theory described as the Implicate Enfolded Reality of space and it is not only curved reality, but manifesting a two-fold reality as well, which is the reason for the physicists believing that the Universe may have a parallel counterpart with in itself. This is further the reason for the single particle wave interference in the double slit experiments. It is then out of the spatial reality, which the material reality issues during the first second of creation, but in the QF-theory this reality is described as the Explicate Unfolded Reality of matter, which is not only in three dimensional spherical shape, but manifesting a two-fold reality as well. These are Explicate Matter (Leptons) and Explicate Implicate Matter (Baryons). In the QF-theory, these two realities are manifested in the the biosphere on planet earth in the DNA nucleotides of eukaryotes, where they are evenly distributed into Exon (Explicate Unfolded Reality) and Intron (Implicate Enfolded Reality) nucleotides. In the central nervous systems of evolved organism such as Homo Sapience, the spatial reality connection to the dual V±-poles, or the V-negative and the V-positive virtual quantum poles of space is then closed through its spatial hemispheric Jamais vu and the Déjà vu centers, but they correspond to the W-negative and the W-positive waves in matter. -- The question whether this can be verified is the subject of this book.
The realities produced by the symmetries described in the last chapter are the ultimate and founding law of the Universe and their creation also writes the constants of nature. The correct apprehension of this fundamental knowledge is here seen as the turning point for humanity in its quest for a comprehension of its existence and the behavioral problems that plague it and now threat its existence, to say nothing of the–by the physicist community much publicized–anticipated consequences for humanity as a whole. The QF-unification visions--although presented in utter simplicity--represent the first such modeling that includes Life and the Observers Consciousness and thus the ultimate truth for Man. The situation in theoretical physics and in theoretical molecular biology has become stagnated and is incapable of solving the riddles they had hope to solve, with the methodology currently used. Here the QF-theory offers an alternate approach through the Venn-mathematical sets, which unequivocally show what the quantum reality options are; IN-enfolded-implicate reality and OUT-unfolded-explicate reality overlapping to form the third Dual-holistic reality as the fundamental reality of the Universe, or as shown here in figure 128:
Fundamental
Composition of the Universes.
Particles Properties and Symmetries, Life and Thought.
Figure 128
Particles Properties and Symmetries, Life and Thought.
 |
Figure 128
The implicate
reality material reality is
in the form of antimatter, which is electrically positive, triplicate-wave
of rainbow stuff captured in quantified-gravity,
through an outer W-positive
spinner-twistor wave. The explicate
reality
material reality is in the form of matter, which is electrically
negative, captured in quantified
gravity, through an outer triplicate-wave
of rainbow stuff W-negative spinnor-twistor wave. The
interaction field arena of these realities is then the paradoxical,
dualistic (that may be regarded as holistic) one that is the implicate
reality of space it-self; a neutral, none material, none
temporal
reality.
After the rejection of the ether concept in physics, a most mysterious media comprising the virtual energy of the vacuum quantum potential replaces it, or simply space, the dual polar originating reality of everything. This suggests that any analysis and understanding of the ultimate nature of the Universe and Man, will have to be rooted in, and understood through, correct comprehension of the fundamental reality of the Universe and how this reality is represented through the qantazised spin of the h constant. This is what the QF-theorizations are striving for. – The field concept of reality and its distribution in figure 128 is no doubt the most important analytical field concept deduction of the QF-visions for the Universe’s First Second. This will be the key to the ultimate understanding of the meaning of the laws of physics. This will be the very foundation of our understanding of how the phenomenon of life comes about in the Universe.
The one thing in the field concept of figure 128 that is outstanding and which strikes the consciousness the most, is the suggestion that the photon is the only particle whose construction corresponds to the whole of this fundamental reality. This indeed makes sense. It is in this sense that the photon is the most fundamental particle. As stated before, the verification of this suggestion will come through a comparison to the findings of physics. It thus follows that we shall, in the next chapters, have to consider the composition of the QF-Venn diagram triplicate membranes and see how these relate to the theorization and findings of physics. We therefore begin the scrutiny of how the splitting of reality becomes apparent at the sub-atomic level. How it becomes the source of the observed bizarre and weird quantum spectra. Weirdness, which to some appears as: “The Reality Marketplace.” The suggestion by some that the discovery of the CUT/TOE may be just some curiosity, which will be without a meaning, appears to be loosing grounds in the face of these analyzes. This may turn out the most meaningful thoughts ever executed in the interest of humanity as a whole.
After the rejection of the ether concept in physics, a most mysterious media comprising the virtual energy of the vacuum quantum potential replaces it, or simply space, the dual polar originating reality of everything. This suggests that any analysis and understanding of the ultimate nature of the Universe and Man, will have to be rooted in, and understood through, correct comprehension of the fundamental reality of the Universe and how this reality is represented through the qantazised spin of the h constant. This is what the QF-theorizations are striving for. – The field concept of reality and its distribution in figure 128 is no doubt the most important analytical field concept deduction of the QF-visions for the Universe’s First Second. This will be the key to the ultimate understanding of the meaning of the laws of physics. This will be the very foundation of our understanding of how the phenomenon of life comes about in the Universe.
The one thing in the field concept of figure 128 that is outstanding and which strikes the consciousness the most, is the suggestion that the photon is the only particle whose construction corresponds to the whole of this fundamental reality. This indeed makes sense. It is in this sense that the photon is the most fundamental particle. As stated before, the verification of this suggestion will come through a comparison to the findings of physics. It thus follows that we shall, in the next chapters, have to consider the composition of the QF-Venn diagram triplicate membranes and see how these relate to the theorization and findings of physics. We therefore begin the scrutiny of how the splitting of reality becomes apparent at the sub-atomic level. How it becomes the source of the observed bizarre and weird quantum spectra. Weirdness, which to some appears as: “The Reality Marketplace.” The suggestion by some that the discovery of the CUT/TOE may be just some curiosity, which will be without a meaning, appears to be loosing grounds in the face of these analyzes. This may turn out the most meaningful thoughts ever executed in the interest of humanity as a whole.
The
QF-Reality and the Exclusion Principle.
In
line with the intention of aligning these analyzes with the findings of
physics, we shall begin by considering the QF-Venn
diagrams in relation
to the consequences of the different spin characteristics. This is in
the light of the in 1924-1925 by Wolfgang
Pauli formulated Exclusion
Principle. To review the basic empirical arbitration of the Exclusion
Principle, this is a rule that simply states that no two
fermions in
the same quantum state (such as charge-spin) can ever be located in the
same place, This property of the fermions is opposite to the behavior
of the bosons, which can be packed together “on top of each other”
in
any number. The exclusions of the fermions from sharing the same place,
is in turn the prime foundation for the manifestation of matter in the
form of the elements, which in turn makes the manifestation of the
material universe possible. It is through this rule that we achieved
the explanation for the periodic table and how atoms combine to form
molecules, but this is the basis for all understanding of chemistry.
In order to see how these laws of Nature fit into the QF-theorizations we have taken some information from the 1982 book THE COSMIC CODE, the late Professors Heinz R. Pagels. In his explanations for the Exclusion Principle property's of the fermions and the bosons, and how plotted wave shapes represented the function of the separation of identical particles, the following remarks accompanied the graphics: “Notice that for even wave shapes the probability (given by the square for the wave shape) for finding two particles on top of each other (x=0) is greatest, while for the odd wave shape the probability for finding the particle on top of each other is zero.”* This is the essence from the spin-statistics theorem in quantum theory, but the main interest in it here is to see how it fits into the QF-theorizations and in particular the QF-Venn diagram's symmetry reality distribution for the Quantum Wave of the Universe.
For this end the probability wave plots were fitted into the QF-Venn diagram symmetry suggestion for the Quantum Wave of the Universe, where it became clear that it was the Z±-waves in the particles’ threefold realities, which was the source of the attraction and rejection forces. This meant that the Z±-brane-shell waves part of the fermion particle originated the repulsion effect to the charge and mass carrying reality. In turn the W-negative and W-positive spiral-twistor waves form the prime magnetic, gluon and graviton attributes through their spatial interaction with their extension in the V-negative and V-positive poles in the vacuum quantum potential, virtual energy of space. Here are the probability wave plots and the QF-theory.
In order to see how these laws of Nature fit into the QF-theorizations we have taken some information from the 1982 book THE COSMIC CODE, the late Professors Heinz R. Pagels. In his explanations for the Exclusion Principle property's of the fermions and the bosons, and how plotted wave shapes represented the function of the separation of identical particles, the following remarks accompanied the graphics: “Notice that for even wave shapes the probability (given by the square for the wave shape) for finding two particles on top of each other (x=0) is greatest, while for the odd wave shape the probability for finding the particle on top of each other is zero.”* This is the essence from the spin-statistics theorem in quantum theory, but the main interest in it here is to see how it fits into the QF-theorizations and in particular the QF-Venn diagram's symmetry reality distribution for the Quantum Wave of the Universe.
For this end the probability wave plots were fitted into the QF-Venn diagram symmetry suggestion for the Quantum Wave of the Universe, where it became clear that it was the Z±-waves in the particles’ threefold realities, which was the source of the attraction and rejection forces. This meant that the Z±-brane-shell waves part of the fermion particle originated the repulsion effect to the charge and mass carrying reality. In turn the W-negative and W-positive spiral-twistor waves form the prime magnetic, gluon and graviton attributes through their spatial interaction with their extension in the V-negative and V-positive poles in the vacuum quantum potential, virtual energy of space. Here are the probability wave plots and the QF-theory.
The
Exclusion Principle and the QF-Symmetry.
Even and odd wave shapes in the separation of identical Particles.
Figure 129
The
CERN 1984 Historic Accelerator Collision.
Figure 130
Even and odd wave shapes in the separation of identical Particles.
 |
Figure 129
Since
the basic reality of the triplicate wave is an indivisible one and the
same for all of its parts, the W±-waves will also be carrying a
part of the electric charge. This in turn is verified in the identical
bosons being capable of being packed together unlimited since the W±-waves can exist forming the third dual reality,
without the Z±-waves–not the other way around. The Z±-waves is thus
the cause for the two mass realities that makes possible the matter
part of the Universe. These are the leptons’ explicate-explicate
reality and the baryons’ explicate-implicate
reality discussed in Part
III, Chapter Four.
Reality
and Elementary Particle Invisibility.
 |
Another way of observing
particles is by plotting their position. The top part of figure 131
shows statistical plotting of the locations of electrons in the atoms
energy-shells, show pairs of opposed spin electrons in the ground state
forming a spherical pattern, then the higher energy forming dumb-bell
patterns. The figure is from J.
Gribbin’s book IN SEARCH OF
THE DOUBLE
HELIX and comes with the following explanations: “The ground-state
electron forms a spherical cloud around the nucleus (a). At the next
level up the energy ladder, electrons can fit in to a spherical shell
or any of three dumb-bell shaped shells around the nucleus (b). Two
electrons can fit in to each of these four shells, so eight electrons
fill this energy level; this explains the repeating patterns of
properties of chemical elements eight numbers apart in the periodic
tables.”* Figure 131 presents further spatial positioning
probability-patterns produced by the invisible electron.
Dual
Electron Ground state and Dumb-bell Electrons.
 |
The lower part of figure 131
is from Gary Zukav’s THE DANCING WU
LI MASTERS, Van Nostrand
1972
created graphs. The accompanying caption reads: “These photographs are
of mechanical simulations of probability density distributions of
different electron states in the hydrogen atom. In other words, they
represent where we are most likely to find the point-like electron
where we look for it if the atom is in this or that particular state
(there are more states than those shown). Initially, Schrödinger
pictured electrons as being tenuous clouds actually assuming these
patterns. A ‘quantum jump’ can be thought of as a transition from one
of these pictures to an other without anything in between.”*
The other
method of man for looking indirectly at fundamental reality is through
the "lens of
mathematics", or rather through the creation of
mathematical models for the elementary particles. Models that would
then be born out through particle accelerator experiments, but the last
meaningful such combination of theory and experiment would be the
electro-weak theorizations which were Nobel prize recognized in 1979,
and then Nobel prize verified in 1984. After this advancement, the
limits of mathematics would start to hamper the theoretical physicist
and the accelerator energy limits, the experimental physicists and the
traditional approach of physics would begin to become "bogged down" as
Professor Stephen Hawking
would describe it. However, by this time a
new approach to the riddles of physics had entered the seen, but this
were the Superstring
theorizations, producing Theories
of Everything.
These were purely mathematical theories which, through super-symmetry
applications, incorporated a multitude of extra dimensions.
The story of this approach began by the CERN particle physicist, Gabriel Veneziano, creating the first string models in the 50s, but not much happened until in 1968 when Yoichiro Nambu would continue the development of the model. The model had arisen out of the creations of mathematical models for various resonances; collisions and scattering processes in so called Regge Trajectories, but its novelty was that it treated the particles as one-dimensional strings instead of the traditional dimensionless points. In many aspects it worked well and around 1970, two physicists, Michael Green and John Schwartz began the continued development of this concept, eventually presenting improved super symmetry-version using the term superstrings.
Figure 132. This modeling and its continued development by a teem of physicists under the direction of David Gross (Princeton string quartet), lead to the term; “Theory of Everything” appearing for its description around 1984. This came about after incorporation of these concepts into the super symmetry equations of mathematical group theories, which linked the superstring concepts to the theorization of the First Second of Creation. From the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, here are some samples of how physicists visualized the superstrings.
As suggested in Part I, Chapter Five, these developments are here claimed to be caused by lack of understanding of the human brain, and in that respect in particular regarding the brain's reality perception and mathematical functional distribution. This is manifested in the physicist's deliberately ignoring the 1931 mysterious Incompleteness Theorem of Kurt Gödel, but the holographic program distribution in the brain, tempts them into its mathematical mirror realities in their efforts at solving the riddle of gravity, without them being aware of this trap. The reason for this is the inability of the normal mathematical approach in dealing with the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity, leading to innumerable incalculable situations, unless the mirror-reality of the brain's mathematical programs are used. Unfortunately, this leads to conclusions that do not represent reality, just like the late Nobel laureate, Professor Paul Dirack, warned. Figure 134 is a two dimensional graphic showing the M-string solution to the relativity-quantum mechanical unification riddle, through 11 dimensional mathematics.
Figure 134
Enter
the Superstring and Membrane Theorizations.
The other
method of man for looking indirectly at fundamental reality is through
the "lens of
mathematics", or rather through the creation of
mathematical models for the elementary particles. Models that would
then be born out through particle accelerator experiments, but the last
meaningful such combination of theory and experiment would be the
electro-weak theorizations which were Nobel prize recognized in 1979,
and then Nobel prize verified in 1984. After this advancement, the
limits of mathematics would start to hamper the theoretical physicist
and the accelerator energy limits, the experimental physicists and the
traditional approach of physics would begin to become "bogged down" as
Professor Stephen Hawking
would describe it. However, by this time a
new approach to the riddles of physics had entered the seen, but this
were the Superstring
theorizations, producing Theories
of Everything.
These were purely mathematical theories which, through super-symmetry
applications, incorporated a multitude of extra dimensions.The story of this approach began by the CERN particle physicist, Gabriel Veneziano, creating the first string models in the 50s, but not much happened until in 1968 when Yoichiro Nambu would continue the development of the model. The model had arisen out of the creations of mathematical models for various resonances; collisions and scattering processes in so called Regge Trajectories, but its novelty was that it treated the particles as one-dimensional strings instead of the traditional dimensionless points. In many aspects it worked well and around 1970, two physicists, Michael Green and John Schwartz began the continued development of this concept, eventually presenting improved super symmetry-version using the term superstrings.
Figure 132. This modeling and its continued development by a teem of physicists under the direction of David Gross (Princeton string quartet), lead to the term; “Theory of Everything” appearing for its description around 1984. This came about after incorporation of these concepts into the super symmetry equations of mathematical group theories, which linked the superstring concepts to the theorization of the First Second of Creation. From the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, here are some samples of how physicists visualized the superstrings.
Simple
samples of Superstrings and their Interactions, and
Graphical samples of Fermion Heterotic Superstrings.
 |
The Transformation of the 10D Superstring
Theories into the 11D Membrane Theories and their
Kinship to the 6D QF-Triplicate Brane-Shell Quanta.
During the next 10 years, 5 superstring unification
theorizations
appeared, claiming to be Theories
of Everything, although they did not
include the DNA-molecule,
Life
and the Consciousness
of the
Observer. In 1994 this had become an embarrassment since these
theories
were composed of different mathematical details but all describing the
same Universe. It was the in 1995, the super brilliant American
physicist, Professor Edward Witten,
of the Institute for Advanced
Studies, saved the situation by combining the five 10
dimensional
theories into one 11
dimensional Membrane Theory, or the so-called M-theory. This rescue action
claimed that the 5 theories had just been
representing 5 different viewpoints looking at the same thing. However,
from what the author can deduce, this theory does not include the DNA-molecule,
Life,
nor the Observer
and his Consciousness.Theories into the 11D Membrane Theories and their
Kinship to the 6D QF-Triplicate Brane-Shell Quanta.
As suggested in Part I, Chapter Five, these developments are here claimed to be caused by lack of understanding of the human brain, and in that respect in particular regarding the brain's reality perception and mathematical functional distribution. This is manifested in the physicist's deliberately ignoring the 1931 mysterious Incompleteness Theorem of Kurt Gödel, but the holographic program distribution in the brain, tempts them into its mathematical mirror realities in their efforts at solving the riddle of gravity, without them being aware of this trap. The reason for this is the inability of the normal mathematical approach in dealing with the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity, leading to innumerable incalculable situations, unless the mirror-reality of the brain's mathematical programs are used. Unfortunately, this leads to conclusions that do not represent reality, just like the late Nobel laureate, Professor Paul Dirack, warned. Figure 134 is a two dimensional graphic showing the M-string solution to the relativity-quantum mechanical unification riddle, through 11 dimensional mathematics.
From
Dimensionless Point Particles to 11-dimensional
Membrane-Superstring Concepts for the Baryons.
Membrane-Superstring Concepts for the Baryons.
 |
However, with the transition
from one dimensional strings (10 math-dimensions), into three
dimensional membranes (11 math-dimensions), this modeling has moved
towards the three dimensional QF-triplicate
brane-shell models (6
Venn-set dimensions). Here it is the known location and function of the
2 extra dimensions--both in the fabric of space and in the human
brain--which justifies the the QF-theory's
claiming of a Theory
of
Everything.
C-04 Questions of:
Relations of Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.
Relations of Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.
The
QF-Triplicate Brane-shell W-wave Gravitons.
Analyzes
of the QF-Venn
diagrams suggest that permanent matter particles
manifest in the form of four symmetries. Two in OUT-explicate-unfolded
reality and two in explicate state of IN-implicate-enfolded
reality.
The symmetries manifest through the W±-waves interactions of the three-in-one
brane-shell waves both internally and with the dual V±-poles in the surrounding space. At the same
time these wave
functions form the internal graviton-gluon field that holds the
particle/wave together, corresponding to the physicist’s gravitons and
the hadrons colored gluons (Internal SNF). Gravitons have never been
detected and are thus described as hypothetical, but the gluon-jets in
the accelerators are a fractional manifestation of this field. In the QF-theorizations the W±-waves are not only responsible for the
gravitons, but for the internal and external (Mesons) nucleons strong
interactions. Figures 135 to 140 present three of the four prime
fermion symmetries, along with their graviton symmetries (the neutron
and the antimatter sides are not presented). The QF-Venn
diagram
graphics have a spin indicator scale on the left side of each
combination of fermion symmetry and graviton symmetry. In spit of the
fact that they are intermingled with the Z±-waves, the gravitons
are a construct of only the two W±-waves, forming their symmetry
internally in the fermions. It is for this reason that their
independent detection has failed, the masons being their closes
relative. If their symmetry is considered alone, mathematically, their
spin characteristics becomes integer (whole) or that of the bosons.
They thus represent the dualistic-holistic
reality as indicated in
figure 128. The fermion symmetry for the particle thus represents a
half-a-reality, the graviton boson symmetry a whole-reality. The spin
for the fermion is thus a half-integer spin, while the spin for the
graviton is an integer spin. This is why one will have to rotate the
1/2 half-integer spin particle two complete rotations before seeing
again the side started with. On the other hand one needs to rotate the
2 whole integer spin particle only half a rotation in order to see the
side started with. – Next, the QF-Venn
diagram’s for the fermions
accompanied by their respective graviton symmetries.
The
ERLS #1MA Lepton Symmetries.
These are the symmetries for the three
mysterious fermions known as neutrinos. The particles whose matter side
is only found with a left hand spin. The particles are generally
identified with the ERLS #2MA fermion symmetries, which they usually
accompany. Increasing mass/energy generation versions of the neutrinos
accompany the electron, the muon and the taon.
Matter-Fermions,
manifesting Explicate-state in Explicate-
Unfolded Reality. Symmetries: ERLS #1MA and its’–not
independently existing–Integral Graviton Symmetry.
Figure 135
Unfolded Reality. Symmetries: ERLS #1MA and its’–not
independently existing–Integral Graviton Symmetry.
 |
 |
Note:
N/S=North/South Magnetic Poles.
The
fact that the QF-symmetry
of the neutrinos has a graviton and a Z±-waves,
is a QF-suggestion
that all neutrinos have mass. This
including the electron neutrino, which suggests further an answer to
the riddle of the dark matter gravitational attraction in the galaxies.
This goes so far as to suggest that the gravitational effect from the
particle may be grater than is usually the case for a given lepton
size. They may well be the mysterious WIMPs, or Weakly Interacting
Massive Particles.
The
ERLS #2MA Lepton Symmetries.
These are the symmetries for the leptons
in the electron class. Particles that are found with left and right
hand spin. These are the prime matter manifesting particles of the
explicate half of the reality of the fermions. They appear in the three
increasing mass/energy generations of the electron, the muon and the
taon.
Matter-Fermions,
manifesting Explicate-state in Explicate-
Unfolded Reality. Symmetries: ERLS
#2MA and its’–not
independently existing–Integral Graviton Symmetry.
 |
 |
The
brane-shell spiral-twistor W±-wave
parts in figure 138 are the
parts of the electrons that represent their gravitons: They are
mirrored in the symmetries of matter and antimatter. This is the
composition of the electric charge spin-state symmetry of the left- and
right-handed-positive-negative chiral leptons producing the stable
electron and the higher generation unstable muon and tau/taon, of which
the first two have complimentary stable neutrinos, with the tau/taon
higher energies neutrino being unstable.
The
IRHS #1MA Baryon Symmetry.
We
come to the oldest implicate fermion symmetry, the youngest in
manifestation, the IRHS #1MA, the 1/2 integer-spin symmetry of the
baryon hadrons. These are the symmetries for the proton and the neutron
fermions. They are explicate-state particles situated in the implicate
half of reality, with left and right-hand spin.
Matter-Fermions,
manifesting Explicate-state in Implicate-
Enfolded Reality. Symmetries: IRHS #1MA
and its’–not
independently existing–Integral Graviton Symmetry.
 |
 |
The
IRHS #1MA symmetry manifests the stable proton and the meta-stable
neutron, and at higher energies, two generations of unstable and
meta-stable baryons known as hyperons. The diagram makes suggestions
how the W±-waves–in addition to curving space–hold the
baryons
together (less smeared out than leptons), and how their rhythm is
responsible for the Law in Nature (physics) that Conserves the number
of Baryons in the Universe.
The
QF-Gravitation’s Extension
into the Dual Polar Virtual Energy of Space.
into the Dual Polar Virtual Energy of Space.
When
the wave nature of light, magnetism and electricity was discovered, Men
asked themselves how this was carried along in space. In what substance
did it wave? It was easy enough to envisage light waving in the
substance of air, but then it was discovered that air only reached a
few kilometers out from earth, and the outside of this space consisted
of no substance; The absolute vacuum. An absolute void in which there
was no media for waves of light to wave in. To explain this an
unspecified media named the ether was imagined to be permeating all of
space. In the last part of the nineteenth century, two US physicists, Michaelson and Morley showed–by ingenious
experiments with light rays
and mirrors–that no ether existed. It followed that light needed
nothing to wave in; its wave function actually became a function of
space, which somehow set its rate of waving to a fixed value; the speed
limit of light. – In the twentieth centuries quantum experiments,
space, the vacuum, the environment of the sub-atomic particles and
their interactions, produced strange phenomena. The enigmas have to do
with the surrounding vacuum and, as John
Wheeler put it: “No point is
more central than this, that empty space is not empty. It is the seat
of the most violent physics.” This was in part a reflection on
the fact
that the physicists had found that the vacuum contained a twofold
probability for creation of matter/energy out of nothing. This is the
vacuum quantum potential or the virtual energy of space, which is
portrayed in all QF-Venn
diagrams by the
positive-gravitational-spatial
side. The most important question in all this is; how does matter
effect the gravitational curvature of space? The answer to this
question being on the quantum level and has to do with what is
generally called quantum gravity. General relativity explains how
gravity is produced by the geometrical structure of space. It tells us
that this curvature is caused by matter, but not how matter
accomplishes this. In the QF-theorizations the gravitational curvature
of space is caused by the two W±-spiral-twistor
waves which form
the boson quanta of the graviton. The graviton is the unit of action in
the gravitational field, whose action comes about through it being an
extension of the dual V±-poles in space. – Before we go any
further lets see this in the 2-D graphics as suggested by the QF-models.
waves into the Dual V-Poles of the Virtual Energy Vacuum.
 |
Interpretation
of Symbols in Figure 141:
  Red
: positive, blue :
negative virtual electrons of the vacuum V-positive and
negative poles. Green
: the world lines (path integrals) of W-waves
gravitational effect. Red
: W-waves magnetic field lines
spatial extension. |
The
Extension of Antimatter’s W±-brane-shell
spinnor-twistor-spiral
waves into the Dual V-Poles of the Virtual Energy Vacuum
waves into the Dual V-Poles of the Virtual Energy Vacuum
 |
Interpretation
of Symbols in Figure 142:
  Red
: positive, blue :
negative virtual electrons of the vacuum V-positive and
negative poles. Green
: the world lines (path integrals) of W-waves
gravitational effect. Red
: W-waves magnetic field lines
spatial extension. |
One of the most difficult challenges of
physics is the demand for the unification of the laws of quantum
mechanics and the laws of general relativity. This is tantamount to a
unification of nothing with something, or to show the relationship of
something, matter/energy to nothing, space/infinite virtual energy.
Figures 141 and 142 show the QF-theory's fundamental
interrelation/extension of units of sub-atomic matter particles
(anti-space) with the dual V±-polar vacuum quantum potential-virtual
energy of space. The term
interaction is not used
here since in the QF-theorizations there are no particles going back
and four. The QF-theorizations suggest that the interrelations manifest
in the collective reality of the W±-spinnor-twistor
waves of the
particle’s graviton and the V±-virtual
energy of the vacuum
quantum potential energy of space. Every set of W±-waves in the
Universe is a physical extension of the 6th
and 5th
dimensions of
space: The V±-poles. The graphics in figures 141 and 142
portray the vacuum polarization and the forming of the magnetic field
lines shown to us by Faraday
and Maxwell. They also show Einstein’s
General
Relativity
world lines, or path
integrals forming the gravitational curvature of space that
produce the gravitational "geodetic effect"
and the "frame
dragging" that are described in the theory. These are also the “Zero
lines of light” or the path of least resistance and
shortest distance (according to general relativity) for the light to
travel.
The two figures show the vacuum polarization by electrons and positrons. The black circular spot at the center represents the lepton particle and inside it is drawn its symmetry (ERLS #2MA+AM). In this phenomena the shared reality of the W±-waves and the spatial dual V±-polar virtual positrons produce a cloud that surrounds the particle and partially shields its electric charge. The QF-Venn diagram format shows the suggested internal field of the electron and the components in it, which are the causes for the extensions of the electrons’ field into the vacuum. The external effects are confirmed by physics. The graphics give us at the same time, a visual presentation of how Einstein’s general relativity tells us that the interaction between matter and space curves and pushes the null-lines of light, denser together nearest to the particles, thus forming the gravitational field. This is the trampoline effect. The subtle effects of this become visible with a massive collection of heavy atoms, such as our sun, where it curves the path of light rays around the body. At the same time it is this that produces the internal gravitational fields–or the gluon fields, if you like that better–and at the same time holds the wave/particle packets together. We alternatively label these fields as gravitons or strong nuclear force, depending on what we are observing or discussing. They are essentially a manifestation of the same force, the original Super force, being observed in different ways.
Discussing the symmetry of the electron neutrino (page 391) the suggestion that they may well be the mysterious WIMPs, or Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, was made. This is suggesting that the fact that the even energy distribution in the Z±-waves and W±-waves making-up the neutrinos, not only accounts for the electrical neutrality, but may also cause the W±-waves to have extremely little magnetic influence. However, the W±-waves may in turn exert quite a lot of gravitational effect on the V±-poles of space. Much greater that would be normally expected relative to their volume. This may have to be experimentally born out, which is almost impossible due to its minute size and absence of interactions in general.
We shall next be looking closer and in more details at the Standard Model and the prime part of the so-called particle zoo. We shall see how these particles fit into the QF-Venn diagram scheme of things. This is done in order to see whether the QF-visions are describing the Universe as it is today. Whether they describe the Universe according to the physicist’s findings. – Well, we are only just beginning to get into the thick of the action when we take a look at:
The two figures show the vacuum polarization by electrons and positrons. The black circular spot at the center represents the lepton particle and inside it is drawn its symmetry (ERLS #2MA+AM). In this phenomena the shared reality of the W±-waves and the spatial dual V±-polar virtual positrons produce a cloud that surrounds the particle and partially shields its electric charge. The QF-Venn diagram format shows the suggested internal field of the electron and the components in it, which are the causes for the extensions of the electrons’ field into the vacuum. The external effects are confirmed by physics. The graphics give us at the same time, a visual presentation of how Einstein’s general relativity tells us that the interaction between matter and space curves and pushes the null-lines of light, denser together nearest to the particles, thus forming the gravitational field. This is the trampoline effect. The subtle effects of this become visible with a massive collection of heavy atoms, such as our sun, where it curves the path of light rays around the body. At the same time it is this that produces the internal gravitational fields–or the gluon fields, if you like that better–and at the same time holds the wave/particle packets together. We alternatively label these fields as gravitons or strong nuclear force, depending on what we are observing or discussing. They are essentially a manifestation of the same force, the original Super force, being observed in different ways.
Discussing the symmetry of the electron neutrino (page 391) the suggestion that they may well be the mysterious WIMPs, or Weakly Interacting Massive Particles, was made. This is suggesting that the fact that the even energy distribution in the Z±-waves and W±-waves making-up the neutrinos, not only accounts for the electrical neutrality, but may also cause the W±-waves to have extremely little magnetic influence. However, the W±-waves may in turn exert quite a lot of gravitational effect on the V±-poles of space. Much greater that would be normally expected relative to their volume. This may have to be experimentally born out, which is almost impossible due to its minute size and absence of interactions in general.
We shall next be looking closer and in more details at the Standard Model and the prime part of the so-called particle zoo. We shall see how these particles fit into the QF-Venn diagram scheme of things. This is done in order to see whether the QF-visions are describing the Universe as it is today. Whether they describe the Universe according to the physicist’s findings. – Well, we are only just beginning to get into the thick of the action when we take a look at:
The QF-Model v/
the Standard
Model.
Part
Three, Chapter Three
the
Standard Model
Overview Comparison of the QF-Models
Matter/Energy Analyzes to the Standard
Model’s
Classification of Particles/Forces
"There
is another school of thought that is far more conventional,
far closer to ordinary intuition than ‘nuclear democracy,’ and in
my
opinion
also
closer to
the truth... The elementary particles
are
thought to consist of the photon and all the known leptons,
but
none of the
known hadrons."
Steven Weinberg
"As a
compact summary of everything we know, the standard model has two major
defects, one aesthetic, one concrete. Our aesthetic sense tells us that
there
are too many particles, too many forces. Worse, the many particles are
distinguished by the seemingly random masses assigned to quarks and
leptons. Even the forces differ largely because of the masses of the
messenger
particles.The problem is one of inconsistency."
Leon M. Lederman
C-05 Questions of:
Connections to Physics Standard Model
Connections to Physics Standard Model
The
Standard Model of Physics.
Lederman’s
insight into the physicist’s difficulties helps us appreciate the
miracle of their work. The physicist’s modeling has to be constructed
through the observation of the tracks left by invisible particles in
the accelerators detectors and bubble chambers, then by reasoning
through mathematical analyzes. This is where the invisible connections
of the W±-waves,
to the dual V±-poles
of space, produces infinities and absurdities in the calculations. The
history of how physicists have been able to discover the realities of
sub-atomic particles and the rules that govern their behavior is a
story of a modern miracle; a story of one of the greatest adventures
and triumphs of the human spirit. These discoveries have produced; The Standard Model
of Physics. Before the QF-analyzes
of the First
Second,
enter into the field of life and consciousness, the comparison of the Standard Models
and the QF-models classification of fundamental particles.
This is also a sort of matching of the different reality-schemes of
these models, which is undertaken in this and the next chapter,
beginning here with the fermions.
The Fermions in the Classification of
Matter/Antimatter Particles of the Standard Model.
Matter/Antimatter Particles of the Standard Model.
During
the 20th century, the physicists discovered hoards (over 200) of
sub-atomic particles of which only a small number remained stable. It
is the so-called First
Generation Particles that are considered to be
the permanent matter particles. In their model, the physicists like to
count the semi-stable particles, but initially it was not known whether
the many different hyperons, resonances or plain splinters, represented
explanations to nature’s mysteries.
 |
There
are only five particles that are truly permanently stable constituents
of matter; all the First
Generation and one in the Second. The rest
of
the Second
and all of the Third
Generation are particles appearing at
higher energies, but not stable. They generally exist for less than a
10.000 of a second. Many of these particles are included in this table
of the Standard
Model’s particles, but only their symmetries are
considered here. Next two pages list the fermions of the Standard Model
as seen by the QF-modeling.
The
Permanent and Temporary Leptons.
Permanent
Particles of the ERLS-MA+AM Symmetries.
Figure 144
 |
The Permanent and Temporary Baryons.
Temporary Particles of the ERLS-MA+AM Symmetries.
 |
The Temporary Baryons.
Temporary Particles of the ERLS-MA+AM Symmetries.
 |
Note:
No table is provided for Third Generation Baryons.
The tables in figures 144, 145 and 146 classify the Fermions, the particles that form solid matter, but it is only a small portion of these particles that constitute the permanent parts. As the Baryon Fermions (nucleons) on the opposite page in figure 147, are classified as additional fundamental particles in the Standard Model, they are being presented here. However, as the reader will have noticed, the QF-theory does not see the quarks as independent fundamental particles, but as one-third parts of the Triplicate QF-quantum particles. A major reason for the physicists taking this stand is the fact that they only see the three-nucleon, or hadron components, in the baryons and the hadrons, not in the leptons. This is not strange since two of the brane-shells (lepto-quarks) in the leptons are so small that their detection is almost inconceivable directly; only indirectly as the QF-theory does. The inability to isolate the quarks has also prevented our detecting of their individual properties.
The search for the fundamental constituents of matter has been the most expensive search in humanity; also the most difficult search requiring the greatest ingenuity, but at the same time it may be the most important and rewarding of all Man’s searches. Man has now found all the components that make up matter in the observable Universe. Suggestions for another complimentary set of invisible particles (E8 shadow) situated in–what is to the perceptions an inaccessible reality–is challenged by the QF-models. The QF-approach rejects all existence of matter belonging to invisible Universes on the grounds that their appearance in the super symmetry mathematics is caused by the holographic mirror arrangement in the construction of the human brain, which starts producing the "Peters Pan's search for his shadow" effect where the brain is dealing with the very fundaments of reality. The logic behind this becomes assessable to the reader in Part Three that deals with the fundamental construction and functions of the human brain.
The Hadron Components.
Inseparable parts of the IRHS-MA+AM Symmetries.
 |
The
Fermions in the QF-Theorizations
Reality Classification of Matter/Antimatter Particles.
Reality Classification of Matter/Antimatter Particles.
Next we look at the same
particles in the QF-theorizations
classification of the fundamental
particles into explicate-unfolded
reality and implicate-enfolded
reality, showing how the resulting classification compliments
the Standard Model.
Note that the QF-classification
does not regard the
quarks as independent fundamental particles.
QF-Reality Classification of the
Fermions.
Figure 148
 |
In order to conform to the physicists look at the quarks, as individual particles, the QF-theorization classification would have to look at the different components of the QF-brane-shell waves as individual particles. This means that in the QF-theorizations, the W±-waves and Z±-waves–located in two different matter-realities–would have to be thought of as particles. If this was the case the QF-classification of these none-independently existing components would end up look something like the following confusion:
W- / W+ = Heterotic String
Spiral-Spinnor-Twistor Particles.
W- / W+ = Heterotic String Spiral-Spinnor-Twistor Quarks.
W- / W+ = Heterotic String Spiral-Spinnor-Twistor Quarks.
Z- / Z+ = Open W-waves
Slaved String Wave Particles.
Z- / Z+ = Open W-waves Slaved String Wave Quarks.
As these particle-waves do not have an independent existence and the QF-theorizations explain the hyperon higher mass quarks as a form of higher mass-energy rhythms in the W±-spinnor-twistor waves. Looking at these waves as independently existing quarks has no meaning and tends to lead us in the wrong reductionistic direction, producing only confusion in our analyzes. The same goes for the higher mass unstable leptons. The net QF-analyzes is that the stable material world is created out of triplicate brane-shells located in different spatial realities. Figure 149 here following gives a simplistic comparison of the two different fundamental classification views of the QF-version of the Standard Model for the Fermions.
Overview
Comparison of the Quantum Components
in the Standard Theoretical Model and QF-theory Model.
Figure 149
in the Standard Theoretical Model and QF-theory Model.
 |
The two tables on the next page, figure 148 and 149, are intended so the reader may get a clear view of the two different views for the composition of the matter side of quantum reality and thus into reality as a whole. In these two views the exquisite simplicity of Nature becomes once again apparent, but the triplicate-brane-shell's of the QF-matter particles fits this simplicity. With this ends the comparison of the QF-model to the Standard Model in the range of the matter particles, the fermions, but all the theoretical and experimental information from the creation of the later have made the former possible.
The
Bosons in the Classification of
Matter/Antimatter Particles of the Standard Model.
Matter/Antimatter Particles of the Standard Model.
As
with the fermions we first have a refresher of the classification of
the
bosons. Here is Figure 019 from Part One.
The
Permanent Bosons.
 |
Figure
151 then list the prime energy carrier particles proposed in the Standard Model,
showing their QF-symmetries
and how they correspond to
the QF-classification.
This composition of the Standard Model
includes
the colored gluons portrayed as the force carriers between the quarks
in QCD, holding them together
in asymptotic freedom to form the
nucleons. Although these have no independent existence and are not seen
as actual force carriers in the QF-theorizations, they are listed in
this table. The composition further includes bosons that do not exist
independently, such as the hypothetical gravitons. In figure 152 we
then have the same particles classified according to the QF-reality,
without the particles which do not exist independently.
The Bosons.
The Force Carriers or Interaction Particles.
Figure 151
The Bosons.
The Force Carriers or Interaction Particles.
 |
The Bosons in the QF-Theorization
Reality Classification of Energy Carrier Particles.
Reality Classification of Energy Carrier Particles.
Here we look at the same energy carrier
particles in the QF-theorizations classification of the particles that
carry the interactions between the explicate-unfolded
reality and implicate-enfolded
reality, in the, from these two, combined dualistic
reality showing how the resulting classification compliments the Standard Model.
QF-Reality Classification of the Bosons
Manifesting Interactions in Dual Reality.
 |
With the exception of the
none-independently existing colored gluon bosons, the QF-theorizations
classification of the interactions is much the same as the one of the Standard Model.
The QF-approaches
regards the mesons as strong
interaction bosons situated in dualistic
reality, outside of the
nucleons, inside the nucleus. This, along with the none-independent
existence of their complimentary quarks, is seen as verification of the
QF-suggestions
for the W±-brane-shell
spiral-twistor waves as
carriers of the strong interactions and the gravitation generating
extension of the spatial V±-poles into matter. The QF-approach
thus
regards the short-lived
W± and Z±
bosons, as
second-fraction manifestations of quark-pairs, in dual-wave forms. The
mesons are thus the particles that come closest to manifest the Higg’s
Field X-bosons quanta.
Overview of the QF-Model's Forces, Causes and Realities.
 |
This chapter’s QF-model graphics for the
components of matter (the fermions), and for the force carriers (the
bosons), are presented in a form that permits their easiest comparison
to the Standard
Model of physics. In this some confusion may have been
brought to the attempts at emphasizing the QF-models main difference
from the Standard
Model, with the emphasis being on the
none-independent existence of gluons, quarks and gravitons. Since the QF-model is founded in–and created in part out
of–the Standard
Model,
this form of presentation is indeed necessary.
The
End Product of the Matter Creation, the Atom!
Recombination of Implicate and Explicate Realties.
Recombination of Implicate and Explicate Realties.
The formation of atoms--the
recombination--takes place between 500.000 to 700.000 years after the First Second.
The Universe’s soup at that time goes through the
temperature of 3000o Kelvin on its way to the present one of 2,7o K. At
this time it has cooled enough to permit the forming of atoms through
the coupling of electrons into 
quantum orbits around the lightest of the
atomic nucleus. This is the forming of the lightest/simplest atoms
of hydrogen, helium, lithium and beryllium. The
heavier atoms will later be fused together in the burning of First Generation
Suns and then spewed out into space through their Supernova explosive
deaths. Figure 154 is an ultra simplistic Bohr-Rutherford expression
for the recombination forming the carbon atom.
Following on this page, in figures 155 we have a surface view of the three- dimensional fundamental particles, followed by a the QF-Venn diagram set look “inside” the internal composition/functions of the recombined quantum units. These are the recombined lepton and baryon that form the simplest atom, but this picture is basically the same for all atoms irrespective of the number of and size. We finally have figure 156 representing the same view with the SCSC camera in the external cutaway mode.
quantum orbits around the lightest of the
atomic nucleus. This is the forming of the lightest/simplest atoms
of hydrogen, helium, lithium and beryllium. The
heavier atoms will later be fused together in the burning of First Generation
Suns and then spewed out into space through their Supernova explosive
deaths. Figure 154 is an ultra simplistic Bohr-Rutherford expression
for the recombination forming the carbon atom.Following on this page, in figures 155 we have a surface view of the three- dimensional fundamental particles, followed by a the QF-Venn diagram set look “inside” the internal composition/functions of the recombined quantum units. These are the recombined lepton and baryon that form the simplest atom, but this picture is basically the same for all atoms irrespective of the number of and size. We finally have figure 156 representing the same view with the SCSC camera in the external cutaway mode.
The Venn Diagram QF-Model for the Hydrogen Atom.
The Detailed Analyzes of its Internal Field.
 |
Interpretation of Symbols in Figure 155:
A
:
The Electron (Explicate) Field.
 |
Manifestation symbol: TM = Time. MA = Mass. MO = Momentum. Taoism: "The named part of the TAO". |
 |
Temporal Arrow of Time (TAT) symbol. A negative quantum wave, of the open part of the superstring that follows the Zero line of light. This is the manifestation of matter in the Out-explicate-unfolded reality initially manifested out of the In-enfolded-implicate reality. The Z-negative wave com- pares with Z-positive wave of the proton, an up quark. It manifest a recombined whole reality and an integer spin characteristics for the atom. |
C :
The Interlocking Field.
 |
Neutral event horizon symbol. Boundary of electrically neutral interlocking collective filed between the lepton and proton, contain opposed charge Z-wave effects, and the parallel effects of the two W-waves. This is the QF-sug- gested explanation for the Sommerfeld coupling con- stant: 1/137036 = 0.0073. |
 |
Electrons W-negative spinnor-twistor-spiral wave symbol. It combines with the negative W-negative spinnor- twistor-spiral down-quark in the proton. This forms a negative energy quantum field between the two particles. |
 |
Electrons Z-negative open superstring wave symbol. It combines with the positive Z-positive open superstring up quark in the proton, down quark in the neutron. This forms a Z-zero wave electrically neutral current quantum field between the two particles. The Z-zero current has been experimentally detected. |
 |
Electrons W+ spinnor-twistor-spiral wave symbol. It combines with the positive W-negative spinnor-twistor- spiral up quark in the proton This forms a positive energy quantum field between the two particles. |
B : The Proton (Implicate) Field.
 |
The W Down Quark symbol. This is the Out-waving negative W-spinnor-twistor-spiral wave that forms the down-quark in the proton. It interacts with the W-negative wave of the electron through the negative vacuum V-poles of space. |
 |
The Z Up Quark symbol. This is the In-waving positive Z-open superstring wave that forms the up quark in the proton. It interacts with the Z-negative wave of the electron through the positive/negative vacuum V-poles of space. |
 |
The W Up Quark symbol. This is the In-waving positive W-spinnor-twistor-spiral wave that forms the up quark in the proton It interacts with the W-negative wave of the electron through the positive vacuum V-poles of space. |
 |
Quantified Gravity symbol. It denotes that the field inside the circles is a quantum gravitational field representing the graviton. This configuration represents the Out-explicate- unfolded reality of baryon gravitons. |
 |
OUT: =
Direction of waves waving out from the objects center, towards it’s
edge,
or event horizon. IN: = Direction of waves waving in from the objects edge, or event horizon. Nowhere in nature is this more conspicuous than in the construction and function principles of the human brain. |
The
SCSC Explicate View of the QF-Hydrogen Atom.
 |
The QF-models and the Constants of Nature.
In their 20th century research
in theoretical and experimental physics, the physicists have come up
with 20 to 26 different measurements for the Universe, known as the Universal Constants.
These constants are numerical values for various objects and phenomena
and are of the "how"
nature of analyses, but do not reveal the "why" nature,
or the causative reasons for these properties of the Universe. Since
the QF-theory
is claiming a Theory
of Everything status, it is fitting that the reasons and moments
of the creation of these constants be pointed out as they appear in the
theory's creation "order of events", this even though the theory does
not produce their numerical values, since they are either measurements
or mathematical findings. Here--courtesy of Professor Brian Greene--are 20 of
these vital signs of the Universe.The 20 Universal
Constants of Nature.
Figure 157
 |
Since
the QF-theory
is producing a parallel view of quantum reality, incapable of producing
any measurements and magnitudes of its own accord, it has to draw the
information from theoretical and experimental physics who decide the
units of measure. This lack of any numerical values or constants in the
QF-theory's analyses of creation means that
consequently there is no comparison between the Standard Model
and the QF-theory in this respect.
However, the QF-theory produces the complimentary view to that of mathematics and experiments, or insights and understandings into the "why" causative side of reality and can thus produces suggestions for the causes of the "how" constants that physics has determined.
The consequence of this is that the QF-theory is offering--as applicable--its light on the reasons for the sizes of these constants and how they came into being. Where this is fitting, the constants will be noted with references to the part, chapter and page where the decisive creation event took place.
The first born fundamental particle is the electron fermion with its size being determined in the Plank Energy Big Bang disintegration (see part II, ch. III, pages 227-231 and 255-259). The electron is a triplicate brane-shell (lepto-quark) particle with two of its brane-shells so small that they have escaped detection, but it is in the "rhythm memory" interactions between the W±-waves and the spatial V-poles that determine its size.
The second born fundamental particle are the virtual massless matter frames (IRHG) for the baryon hadron fermions and its size is determined in the Plank Energy Big Bang disintegration. These virtual particles are then “mass topped-up” during the exponential inflationary phase of the Universe (see part II, ch. III, pages 236-240 and 315-339). The fundamental baryons of protons and neutrons are triplicate brane-shell (hadro-quark) particles whose brane-shells sizes are determined at the same time as the particle was created, but it is in the "rhythm memory" interactions between the W±-waves and the spatial V-poles that determine its size.
It is during this same time that the photon is created and it is the previous creation of the electron that determines its size on the same grounds. Once the neutron baryons have appeared the electron neutrino is born with its size being determined by the excess energy of the neutron (see part III, ch. IV, page 437), but it is with the birth and sizes of these particles that the character and size of the rest of the bosons are determined. The same then applies to the four fundamental forces of nature, whose strength is determined by the sizes and character of the W±-waves of the fermions. The two additional higher mass generations of hyperons, the muon, muon neutrino, the tau, tau neutrino, the charm quark, the strange quark, the top quark, the bottom quark, which all but the Muon, exist only for a fraction of a second, are all “brane-shell memories” from the initiation of creation, prior to Big Bang disintegration. The only other constant of interest here is the week coupling constant whose reasons are explained here prior on pages 409 to 412. -- This is the magic of the two human brain’s hemispheres observing the creation process in unison.
However, the QF-theory produces the complimentary view to that of mathematics and experiments, or insights and understandings into the "why" causative side of reality and can thus produces suggestions for the causes of the "how" constants that physics has determined.
The consequence of this is that the QF-theory is offering--as applicable--its light on the reasons for the sizes of these constants and how they came into being. Where this is fitting, the constants will be noted with references to the part, chapter and page where the decisive creation event took place.
The first born fundamental particle is the electron fermion with its size being determined in the Plank Energy Big Bang disintegration (see part II, ch. III, pages 227-231 and 255-259). The electron is a triplicate brane-shell (lepto-quark) particle with two of its brane-shells so small that they have escaped detection, but it is in the "rhythm memory" interactions between the W±-waves and the spatial V-poles that determine its size.
The second born fundamental particle are the virtual massless matter frames (IRHG) for the baryon hadron fermions and its size is determined in the Plank Energy Big Bang disintegration. These virtual particles are then “mass topped-up” during the exponential inflationary phase of the Universe (see part II, ch. III, pages 236-240 and 315-339). The fundamental baryons of protons and neutrons are triplicate brane-shell (hadro-quark) particles whose brane-shells sizes are determined at the same time as the particle was created, but it is in the "rhythm memory" interactions between the W±-waves and the spatial V-poles that determine its size.
It is during this same time that the photon is created and it is the previous creation of the electron that determines its size on the same grounds. Once the neutron baryons have appeared the electron neutrino is born with its size being determined by the excess energy of the neutron (see part III, ch. IV, page 437), but it is with the birth and sizes of these particles that the character and size of the rest of the bosons are determined. The same then applies to the four fundamental forces of nature, whose strength is determined by the sizes and character of the W±-waves of the fermions. The two additional higher mass generations of hyperons, the muon, muon neutrino, the tau, tau neutrino, the charm quark, the strange quark, the top quark, the bottom quark, which all but the Muon, exist only for a fraction of a second, are all “brane-shell memories” from the initiation of creation, prior to Big Bang disintegration. The only other constant of interest here is the week coupling constant whose reasons are explained here prior on pages 409 to 412. -- This is the magic of the two human brain’s hemispheres observing the creation process in unison.
The QF-models and the Fabric of Space.
In physics this is given many terms such as the "structure of the vacuum at the quantum level," or the "zero negative energy of the vacuum", or the "fabric of space". It is out of this structure of infinite nothing, which the material Universe has come from in less than a second, but this "nothing" is that which has been referred to in the
This is saying that in addition to Einstein's 1916 General Relativity description of space that "nothing is curved, not straight", this leads to the
The
Wave-Particle Duality in the Double Slit Experiments.
Figure 158
 |
This
spatial foundation of reality becomes observable in figure 158, which
proposes to present the simplest and the most mysterious of the famous
double slit experiments. In both experiments the wave crest and through
cancel each other out when the waves are out of phase and reinforce
each other when they are in phase. In the first--steady light
flow--experiment we become aware of the dual particle/wave nature of
the quantum particles, but it is in the second--individual particle
interrupted emission--experiment where the mystifying nature of the
twofold QF-space
becomes conscious to us. This experiment has lead to
may physicists becoming convinced that we are living in a parallel
interconnected universes, where as the QF-theory only needs the twofold
infinity of twofold space.
 |
This
insight may be the most important in the QF-theory's analyzes, since it
becomes the foundation for the theory's analyzes of the structure of DNA-molecule
of life, consciousness
and the human
brain structure,
functions and malfunctions. Without this insight the QF-brain
models
become impossible to fit to the reality of the Observer
and without the
theory including the reality machine of the human brain--which is
creating the theory and making the analyzes of reality--these
theorizations become practically useless and thus worthless and the QF-theory thus just a Theory
of Something, not Everything.
This then is the end of the QF-theory's comparison to the Standard Model of physics and we turn to the QF-theory's spin properties comparison and verification, but it was during the author's interpretation of the vision and his writing the interpretation in THE LITTLE SCROLL, that he came across another equally remarkable approach to the problem of particle model creation by a Russian American, Dr. Vladimir Ginzburg. Dr. Ginzburg is using a mathematical and graphical approach in which he has come up with a similar form called Helicola and which he presented in 1993 in a science paper, His description for a triplicate spin structures in the energy flow of the magnetic field, is quite similar to that of the triplicate membrane bosonic flow described by the QF-theory and which becomes quite an important insight in the understanding of the functions of the consciousness of the human brain.
In 1999 Dr. Ginzburg published a book on the subject titled, UNIFIED SPIRAL FIELD AND MATTER, but in it he proposes models that are conceptually similar to the QF-Venn triplicate-brane models.
This then makes us ready to look at:
This then is the end of the QF-theory's comparison to the Standard Model of physics and we turn to the QF-theory's spin properties comparison and verification, but it was during the author's interpretation of the vision and his writing the interpretation in THE LITTLE SCROLL, that he came across another equally remarkable approach to the problem of particle model creation by a Russian American, Dr. Vladimir Ginzburg. Dr. Ginzburg is using a mathematical and graphical approach in which he has come up with a similar form called Helicola and which he presented in 1993 in a science paper, His description for a triplicate spin structures in the energy flow of the magnetic field, is quite similar to that of the triplicate membrane bosonic flow described by the QF-theory and which becomes quite an important insight in the understanding of the functions of the consciousness of the human brain.
In 1999 Dr. Ginzburg published a book on the subject titled, UNIFIED SPIRAL FIELD AND MATTER, but in it he proposes models that are conceptually similar to the QF-Venn triplicate-brane models.
This then makes us ready to look at:
Physics Conclusions.
